The elephant moves
June 3, 2012 10:55 AM Subscribe
“Sexual orientation does make you poor,” says Manohar Elavarthi, a community organizer with Sangama in Bangalore. “Poverty is not just economic – you miss access to so many things: ration cards, inheritance rights, voter ID cards.” In several South Asian countries, there are reports that LGBT people have even been denied access to disaster relief. And homophobia is intricately connected with other divisions in South Asian societies, particularly around gender but also religion and caste.
Yet I saw many signs of hope and change in both India and Nepal. Those transgender sex workers in Chennai have organized a coalition, called V-CAN, of every single community-based organization in the state of Tamil Nadu that serves homosexual or transgender people. Working with the NGO Praxis, they have been able to gain access to some public benefits, such as pensions and registering as “third gender” on government ID cards. Activists in Nepal’s Blue Diamond Society have achieved similar results and more. ~ World Bank blog post
Can someone explain what the dissolution of Nepal's parliament last week means for the theoretical mandate that their new (and overdue) constitution would recognize same-sex marriage?
posted by psoas at 11:39 AM on June 3, 2012
posted by psoas at 11:39 AM on June 3, 2012
Er, I mean theoretical constitution, seeing as they haven't passed one.
posted by psoas at 11:40 AM on June 3, 2012
posted by psoas at 11:40 AM on June 3, 2012
@hippybear:
"I heard news about this "third gender" thing on Gay USA this week, and was wondering about the greater context"
India's traditional gender/sexuality classification system has 3 genders: kothis (biological males who are "feminine"), panthis (biological males who are "masculine") and narans (biological females who are feminine. Kothis desire panthis; panthis desire kothis or narans. So in this system, there are men (panthis) and non-men (kothis and narans)- notice the classification is based on gender, not so much biological sex.
Hijras are the highest ranking kothis and are sometimes called the 3rd gender. Hijras are biological males who achieve their status through a ritual initiation into womanhood and being inducted into a "family" (sort of like the "houses" of the NY ball culture I thought) and often through castration. (like transgendered people in the West who can afford regular surgery, hormone treatments)
Hijras had royal patronage before the British, they played a role in many traditional rituals (weddings, births), they entertained in court. British colonial rule in an effort to "clean up", sanitize, etc, re-categorized hijras amongst others in the "criminal caste".
Also the time when sodomy, emasculation, and other "unnatural sex" became incorporated into the criminal code in India. The same colonial law that was upturned recently and which the article refers to.
Hijras are typically from a lower socio-economic strata; their 'poverty' complicated by their sexuality/gender as the article mentions. Middle class trans people -when they dare- opt for surgery and transitioning 'proper'
@ John Cohen: Homosex was de-criminalized last year - in the Delhi high-court (Supreme Court verdict is awaited). Marriage is a distant dream...
posted by drummergirl80 at 12:50 PM on June 3, 2012 [7 favorites]
"I heard news about this "third gender" thing on Gay USA this week, and was wondering about the greater context"
India's traditional gender/sexuality classification system has 3 genders: kothis (biological males who are "feminine"), panthis (biological males who are "masculine") and narans (biological females who are feminine. Kothis desire panthis; panthis desire kothis or narans. So in this system, there are men (panthis) and non-men (kothis and narans)- notice the classification is based on gender, not so much biological sex.
Hijras are the highest ranking kothis and are sometimes called the 3rd gender. Hijras are biological males who achieve their status through a ritual initiation into womanhood and being inducted into a "family" (sort of like the "houses" of the NY ball culture I thought) and often through castration. (like transgendered people in the West who can afford regular surgery, hormone treatments)
Hijras had royal patronage before the British, they played a role in many traditional rituals (weddings, births), they entertained in court. British colonial rule in an effort to "clean up", sanitize, etc, re-categorized hijras amongst others in the "criminal caste".
Also the time when sodomy, emasculation, and other "unnatural sex" became incorporated into the criminal code in India. The same colonial law that was upturned recently and which the article refers to.
Hijras are typically from a lower socio-economic strata; their 'poverty' complicated by their sexuality/gender as the article mentions. Middle class trans people -when they dare- opt for surgery and transitioning 'proper'
@ John Cohen: Homosex was de-criminalized last year - in the Delhi high-court (Supreme Court verdict is awaited). Marriage is a distant dream...
posted by drummergirl80 at 12:50 PM on June 3, 2012 [7 favorites]
Anthropology 301... I am all for human rights and knowing where we came from. Thing is how long do we cling to the past? Should we be planning reparations for past injustice? There comes a time when there is no excuse and people must confront their humanity. We are a single species human beings. Diversity is a distraction. I am not ignoring the past but understand it is past. Moving forward...
posted by pdxpogo at 2:25 PM on June 3, 2012
posted by pdxpogo at 2:25 PM on June 3, 2012
If I've said it once, I've said it a million times:
posted by Blue_Villain at 3:00 PM on June 3, 2012 [2 favorites]
Homophobia does not mean you're afraid of gay people.Anybody who uses first word of that phrase to identify people's behavior is doing the world a tremendous disservice by not also including the last.
It's not even a real phobia.
It just means you're an asshole.
posted by Blue_Villain at 3:00 PM on June 3, 2012 [2 favorites]
there are reports that LGBT people have even been denied access to disaster relief.
I'd like to know where I could find said reports. I work for the world's largest NGO which could be labled "Christian" although our work isn't tied to any missionary / proselytizing / evangelism, and I know for a fact that our disaster relief work explicitly forbids any discrimination on any factor like sex, race, sexual orientation, religion, etc.. Even Islamic Relief has similar standards in place. Really the only discrimination accusation that could be made at most NGOs is that we discriminate against distributing aid to single men in favor of distributing it instead to female head-of-households as there is documented proof that in such cases the aid has a higher chance of helping those most in danger (the children), and the least chances of misuse (reselling, etc.).
posted by allkindsoftime at 9:08 PM on June 3, 2012
I'd like to know where I could find said reports. I work for the world's largest NGO which could be labled "Christian" although our work isn't tied to any missionary / proselytizing / evangelism, and I know for a fact that our disaster relief work explicitly forbids any discrimination on any factor like sex, race, sexual orientation, religion, etc.. Even Islamic Relief has similar standards in place. Really the only discrimination accusation that could be made at most NGOs is that we discriminate against distributing aid to single men in favor of distributing it instead to female head-of-households as there is documented proof that in such cases the aid has a higher chance of helping those most in danger (the children), and the least chances of misuse (reselling, etc.).
posted by allkindsoftime at 9:08 PM on June 3, 2012
« Older "This is a museum without an ending." | A salty debate Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by John Cohen at 11:39 AM on June 3, 2012 [1 favorite]