it's so cruel what Mitt Romney did to that dog
July 27, 2012 8:03 PM   Subscribe

Charles Davis in The New Inquiry has a modest proposal for the anti-drone left.

We should be extremely wary of claims to innocence by any “victim” of the Obama administration. We know Republicans will stop at nothing to undermine his presidency, so when confronted with hundreds of children burned to death by Hellfire missiles under his watch, one must ask, Who does it benefit? If their charred remains will be used to undermine the left’s enthusiasm for the president, depressing voter turnout — a classic tactic of Karl Rove — can they really be said to be innocent at all?
posted by gerryblog (5 comments total)

This post was deleted for the following reason: We've got a pretty active and contentious drone post going and we'd like to corral political stuff into fewer threads if possible. Feel free to post this there. -- restless_nomad



 
Why is this a modest proposal? If it was satire I must have missed it.
posted by munchingzombie at 8:09 PM on July 27, 2012


wow, what a piece of shit.
posted by facetious at 8:10 PM on July 27, 2012 [1 favorite]


I, for one, am thrilled that the metal wars have begun. Its what, only 80 years from until captain power will appear to free us from lord dress?
posted by Chekhovian at 8:10 PM on July 27, 2012 [1 favorite]


If it was satire I must have missed it.

Did you not read to the end? Do you think a little girl's last words after being killed in a drone strike were "It's so cruel what Mitt Romney did to that dog"?
posted by gerryblog at 8:11 PM on July 27, 2012


swift, this ain't.
posted by TwelveTwo at 8:12 PM on July 27, 2012 [1 favorite]


« Older A Most Tubular Guy   |   an elegant loop within a loop of springy steel... Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments