Haplotype V Represent!
February 6, 2007 7:43 PM Subscribe
This post was deleted for the following reason: previously
But for an individual who might be expecting to learn about his ancesters 10,000 years ago, it should be explained that they're only getting information about two from each generation.
One, for women, I think.
posted by dilettante at 8:06 PM on February 6, 2007
One, for women, I think.
posted by dilettante at 8:06 PM on February 6, 2007
What nonwonmai said. It is interesting to know where my father's father's father came from. But its only 1/8th of the information I'd like to know about my ancestors of that generation. And it gets worse as you go further back...
posted by vacapinta at 8:09 PM on February 6, 2007
posted by vacapinta at 8:09 PM on February 6, 2007
Double, probably way more and discussed on AskMefi quite a lot. Waiting for my results...patiently.
posted by jimmythefish at 8:33 PM on February 6, 2007
posted by jimmythefish at 8:33 PM on February 6, 2007
(Previously tagged 'genes', which didn't show up in my search for 'genetics'. Hmph.)
posted by gimonca at 9:00 PM on February 6, 2007
posted by gimonca at 9:00 PM on February 6, 2007
This would be hot if I could trace my birthparents to my as yet unknown hometown.
I already know I'm from Africa, originally.
posted by exlotuseater at 9:03 PM on February 6, 2007
I already know I'm from Africa, originally.
posted by exlotuseater at 9:03 PM on February 6, 2007
This overemphasis on mitochondrial and Y-chromosome DNA really annoys me.
Your overemphasis on humans annoys* me.
Truth is, analysis of variation in mtDNA code has been tremendously helpful in inferring the evolutionary history of species from every kingdom.
But, yeah, maybe not as helpful if you're looking to do molecular geneology.
* No, not really. Just a rhetorical thingy. No offense intended.
posted by docgonzo at 9:10 PM on February 6, 2007
Your overemphasis on humans annoys* me.
Truth is, analysis of variation in mtDNA code has been tremendously helpful in inferring the evolutionary history of species from every kingdom.
But, yeah, maybe not as helpful if you're looking to do molecular geneology.
* No, not really. Just a rhetorical thingy. No offense intended.
posted by docgonzo at 9:10 PM on February 6, 2007
« Older Photos from Hiroshima | Spotted dick will never stop being funny. Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
In terms of the big picture, yes these studies are informative about patterns of human migration. But for an individual who might be expecting to learn about his ancesters 10,000 years ago, it should be explained that they're only getting information about two from each generation.
posted by nowonmai at 8:00 PM on February 6, 2007