MSM?
November 21, 2007 9:37 AM   Subscribe

Top 10 most viewed pages on Conservapedia. What's going on with this site?
posted by mrgrimm (25 comments total)

This post was deleted for the following reason: We've already had a whopper of a thread about Conservapedia this year; a LOL GAYBOMB update doesn't really cut the mustard. -- cortex



 
Is this for real?
posted by farishta at 9:39 AM on November 21, 2007


What's going on with this site?

Conservative thought. And it would appear they think about homosexuals and homosexuality a lot.
posted by DU at 9:39 AM on November 21, 2007 [1 favorite]


They love the cock?
posted by Rubbstone at 9:40 AM on November 21, 2007 [2 favorites]


Teh ghey. They has it.
posted by BitterOldPunk at 9:44 AM on November 21, 2007


I think it's 350,000 Congressional pages becoming anxious about the advances of their bosses.

Kudos for poking around the site long enough to find those statistics. Laughter will ensue.
posted by Room 101 at 9:44 AM on November 21, 2007


Hey! You got your wow-it's-another-web-encyclopedia mixed up with my wow-it's-another-conservative-attempt-to-copy-something-they-think-is-too-liberal!

It's a flavor that I'm gonna love to hate.
posted by koeselitz at 9:45 AM on November 21, 2007


As amusing as this is, I would guess someone is gaming their system in some way.
posted by never used baby shoes at 9:46 AM on November 21, 2007


Wow. They're obsessed.
posted by WPW at 9:47 AM on November 21, 2007


I would guess someone is gaming their system in some way.

I don't see how that could be. Aren't conservatives the go-to guys for security?
posted by DU at 9:48 AM on November 21, 2007


Ask master control (top left).
posted by weapons-grade pandemonium at 9:48 AM on November 21, 2007


worth bookmarking just for the weirdness. (and strange predictability.)
posted by lodurr at 9:48 AM on November 21, 2007


All of you are under the mistake impression that the bulk of Conservapedia's traffic is from Conservatives and not people who think Conservapedia is hilarious and the homosexuality articles especially so.
posted by nmiell at 9:50 AM on November 21, 2007


All of you are under the mistake impression that the bulk of Conservapedia's traffic is from Conservatives

But it's more funny to pretend.
posted by Room 101 at 9:52 AM on November 21, 2007


yeah, dammit, don't ruin the damn joke!
posted by lodurr at 9:53 AM on November 21, 2007


Wow, the article for Heterosexuality is scanty by comparison. It sure is informative though. I'm glad to know that "It is good for a man not to touch a woman." (1 Corinthians 7:1).
posted by Room 101 at 9:56 AM on November 21, 2007


They've probably been Gay Bombed.
posted by contraption at 9:56 AM on November 21, 2007


Conservatives appear to be trying to diagnose their ailments.
posted by fire&wings at 9:56 AM on November 21, 2007


This must be the last ranking of anything on the Internet that doesn't have Ron Paul at the top of the list.
posted by brain_drain at 9:58 AM on November 21, 2007 [2 favorites]


This must be the last ranking of anything on the Internet that doesn't have Ron Paul at the top of the list.

Ron Paul is a gay syphilitic?
posted by Pollomacho at 10:01 AM on November 21, 2007


MSM? M4M more like.
posted by empath at 10:01 AM on November 21, 2007


By their Fruits shall ye know them.
posted by kirkaracha at 10:01 AM on November 21, 2007


I like their page on Homophobia too:
The term homophobia is a snarl word used by gay rights activists to verbally tar and feather anyone who dares to oppose homosexuality. The term implies that everyone who opposes homosexuality is being irrational, i.e., literally suffering from a mental illness (see also Phobia).

posted by contraption at 10:02 AM on November 21, 2007


Best of the statistics.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 10:04 AM on November 21, 2007


All of you are under the mistake impression that the bulk of Conservapedia's traffic is from Conservatives...

Given the very, very low numbers of conservatives who can even spell TCP/IP let alone read Conservapedia, this is a valid point. However, only invited members can edit and create topics (or something--in any case, I've never been allowed to as a regular member). Articles on the intricacies and methodlogy of homosexuality comprise a much higher percentage of the content on their site than most, so it reveals an obsession of some kind on the part of somebody.
posted by DU at 10:05 AM on November 21, 2007


The most viewed pages on Wikipedia are not enormously more encouraging.

I like how the entry in Conservapedia on 'Mockery' focused on Bushisms.
posted by sindark at 10:09 AM on November 21, 2007 [1 favorite]


« Older A surprising idea for "solving" climate change   |   Cooking the Books Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments