Miley Cyrus upskirt shot: Child porn?
June 15, 2010 7:29 AM   Subscribe

"Miley Cyrus upskirt shot: Child porn?" "Blogger Perez Hilton posts a link to an alleged upskirt photo of the 17-year-old -- and could face serious charges." The photo in question has since been yanked down, but the image is allegedly of Cyrus climbing out of a car wearing a dress and no underwear. Censored up-skirt image.

More on Perez and up-skirt shots in this Guardian article: He pioneered upskirt shots. Can we pay a bigger tribute?
posted by Fizz (17 comments total)

This post was deleted for the following reason: This really doesn't seem like a good idea. -- cortex



 
does this need to be here?
posted by empath at 7:29 AM on June 15, 2010 [2 favorites]


The article discusses whether or not Perez Hilton should be charged? Thinking the discussion would be more on the legality of taking action against him.
posted by Fizz at 7:31 AM on June 15, 2010


This is not a good post for MetaFilter.

FFS.
posted by felix betachat at 7:32 AM on June 15, 2010


Without actually wanting to take a stand on anything, I would like to point out that it strikes me as emblematic of something that a photograph that features the nudity of a minor is automatically child pornography. Are upskirt shots of adults automatically considered pornography?
posted by shakespeherian at 7:34 AM on June 15, 2010


While the subject matter is obviously sensational, the discussion about the legality of taking action against blogger Perez Hilton is pretty serious. I don't like him and I find Miley Cyrus to be another tart of the week but these issues do effect people.
posted by Fizz at 7:34 AM on June 15, 2010


that picture is not anatomically possible...photoshop.
does that affect the charges of kiddy porn, tho?
posted by sexyrobot at 7:35 AM on June 15, 2010


I think this whole thing is an attempt from Salon to get google hits ("Miley cyrus"+porn). I bet at least one or two twisted individuals has been searching that string every hour of every day for 4 years now.
posted by Bathtub Bobsled at 7:36 AM on June 15, 2010


This is a stupid post and it should be removed. Metafilter is too good for this low crap.
posted by flapjax at midnite at 7:37 AM on June 15, 2010 [1 favorite]


Without actually wanting to take a stand on anything, I would like to point out that it strikes me as emblematic of something that a photograph that features the nudity of a minor is automatically child pornography. Are upskirt shots of adults automatically considered pornography?

The subject of this comment....

that picture is not anatomically possible...photoshop.
does that affect the charges of kiddy porn, tho?


...as well as this are why I posted the links.

Another pop-star gone bad is not really the subject, we've all been there and done that. But the legal and ethical issues of this are something to discuss.
posted by Fizz at 7:37 AM on June 15, 2010


But the legal and ethical issues of this are something to discuss.

You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the way MetaFilter works.
posted by felix betachat at 7:39 AM on June 15, 2010


If she can't afford underpants, Disney must not be paying her enough.

Won't someone please think of the children??
posted by Joe Beese at 7:39 AM on June 15, 2010 [4 favorites]


I think charges should be filed against her parents. When I was still in high school we were reminded to put on clean underwear daily in case we got in an accident. I don't see how this is any different. Further evidence of the erosion of vital parenting skills in this once-proud country.
posted by mecran01 at 7:39 AM on June 15, 2010 [2 favorites]


You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the way MetaFilter works.

Are you saying that discussing events that occur in the media that affect people ethically and legally are not worth discussing on metafilter?
posted by Fizz at 7:40 AM on June 15, 2010


Are upskirt shots of adults automatically considered pornography?

Litmus test: Go downtown and candidly snap a few photos under several skirts. If her face turns red, there may be a correlation. If your are arrested in under 2 hours, I think you can safely refute the null hypothesis on this one, dude.
posted by Bathtub Bobsled at 7:41 AM on June 15, 2010 [1 favorite]


I logged in from work just so I could flag this post.
posted by MegoSteve at 7:41 AM on June 15, 2010 [1 favorite]


The fact that Perez Hilton is actually a public figure is a damning indictment of our culture.
posted by The Card Cheat at 7:42 AM on June 15, 2010 [5 favorites]


I want to comment before it's ganked: If this is what it takes to get rid of Perez Hilton? GO FOR IT! OK. I've said my piece. Buh-bye, Perez.
posted by symbioid at 7:42 AM on June 15, 2010


« Older Where are Americans Moving?   |   "Those games up there are what they are depending... Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments