April 2, 2002
10:33 AM Subscribe
Pornografux has launched, ya perverts. Not really porn, actually, and nearly worksafe, though a couple of the pieces have grating some audio. The initial offering asks what the connections are between our "sexual" and "social" bodies.
Yeh, Okay.
I have made a value judgement, the value i could derive from this site is not worth the cognitive effort required to find it.
posted by delmoi at 2:42 PM on April 2, 2002
I have made a value judgement, the value i could derive from this site is not worth the cognitive effort required to find it.
posted by delmoi at 2:42 PM on April 2, 2002
But it apparently was worth you bitching about it, and hey, that's something, too.
There's a coupon for some free Calgon in the mail for you already.
posted by Su at 3:17 PM on April 2, 2002
There's a coupon for some free Calgon in the mail for you already.
posted by Su at 3:17 PM on April 2, 2002
"Nearly worksafe"?! How exactly does a spreadshot closeup of a woman's vagina strike you as even marginally worksafe? I mean, unless you're a gynocologist of course...
...other than that. Boring, pointless flashterbation was all I saw. I think the creator really WANTS to have deep thoughts but spent too much time pr0n surfing for background images to have any.
posted by RevGreg at 3:48 PM on April 2, 2002
...other than that. Boring, pointless flashterbation was all I saw. I think the creator really WANTS to have deep thoughts but spent too much time pr0n surfing for background images to have any.
posted by RevGreg at 3:48 PM on April 2, 2002
If that was supposed to inspire me to think about something or feel something, I don't know what.
posted by planetkyoto at 4:03 PM on April 2, 2002
posted by planetkyoto at 4:03 PM on April 2, 2002
i feel insulted just having seen it...
posted by gelatinouscitizen at 4:19 PM on April 2, 2002
posted by gelatinouscitizen at 4:19 PM on April 2, 2002
While taking itself a little quite a bit too seriously, I thought it was a very fascinating collection. Some were certainly stronger than others, but as you can tell from the responses so far it seems to have done a good job of stirrin' shit up. Thanks for the link, Su.
posted by modofo at 6:43 PM on April 2, 2002
posted by modofo at 6:43 PM on April 2, 2002
Art is in the eye of the beholder and I rather not have my eyes see this. The girl with the can in her vagina was definitly not work safe.
posted by MaddCutty at 10:40 PM on April 2, 2002
posted by MaddCutty at 10:40 PM on April 2, 2002
Wow, this must have been really good. Unfortunately for me they have exceeded their bandwidth allowance. Now I have the choice to either wait or to forget about the whole thing. Which do you think I'll choose?
posted by hotmud at 8:22 AM on April 3, 2002
posted by hotmud at 8:22 AM on April 3, 2002
« Older Islamic nations dodge defining terrorism. | Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by ook at 11:36 AM on April 2, 2002