discussing words and pictures
June 15, 2004 12:56 PM Subscribe
The Webcomics Examiner launched earlier this week. Finally, a well-written magazine of criticism for online comics.
the review of sexy losers was intelligent and priceless
as well as accompanied by NSFW cartoons.
posted by milnak at 1:46 PM on June 15, 2004
as well as accompanied by NSFW cartoons.
posted by milnak at 1:46 PM on June 15, 2004
[this is a good idea]
up to now, I've generally depended on the "these are the comics I read" lists of the artists that I respect.
not-terribly-clever clay/hard-related anecdote: back when thinhline disappeared, I had absolutely no idea what had happened. eventually I heard about sexylosers ... from a totally fundamentalist christian friend. heh, wtf?!
ps clango I've said this before, but my gf is loving her 'jesus helps me trick ppl' tshirt more and more every day... been a few years, getting careworn, I may have to get her a new one.
posted by dorian at 2:00 PM on June 15, 2004
up to now, I've generally depended on the "these are the comics I read" lists of the artists that I respect.
not-terribly-clever clay/hard-related anecdote: back when thinhline disappeared, I had absolutely no idea what had happened. eventually I heard about sexylosers ... from a totally fundamentalist christian friend. heh, wtf?!
ps clango I've said this before, but my gf is loving her 'jesus helps me trick ppl' tshirt more and more every day... been a few years, getting careworn, I may have to get her a new one.
posted by dorian at 2:00 PM on June 15, 2004
Well it's got a manila paper backdrop - I'm sold!
posted by Pretty_Generic at 2:10 PM on June 15, 2004
posted by Pretty_Generic at 2:10 PM on June 15, 2004
Thanks for the clue! The site looks very promising. Now if only Dirk would bring ¡Journalista! back.
posted by mwhybark at 2:49 PM on June 15, 2004
posted by mwhybark at 2:49 PM on June 15, 2004
Speaking of Clay/Hard, he thinks webcomics should never be reviewed. Of course that was when the review was negative.
posted by FunkyHelix at 3:20 PM on June 15, 2004
posted by FunkyHelix at 3:20 PM on June 15, 2004
thanks for that, 'helix -- the comments are hilarious. ('porn-industry chilluns', heh...)
/current mood: semi-drunk
/current music: london 0 hull 4
posted by dorian at 3:32 PM on June 15, 2004
/current mood: semi-drunk
/current music: london 0 hull 4
posted by dorian at 3:32 PM on June 15, 2004
"Sexy Losers" is the closest comic to "mainstream" that the webcomics examiner has strayed. I read at least nine webcomics daily, I've read many, many more, and I know way, way, way too much about the whole genre, and Sexy Losers was the only comic on the site I'd ever even HEARD of - and I'm reasonably internet literate.
That has to be intentional. Fetus-X really intrigued me, but considering that you actually have to pay for a subscription to read it all, and the one panel shown in the preview didn't exactly inspire confidence, I really don't know.
posted by Veritron at 6:16 PM on June 15, 2004
That has to be intentional. Fetus-X really intrigued me, but considering that you actually have to pay for a subscription to read it all, and the one panel shown in the preview didn't exactly inspire confidence, I really don't know.
posted by Veritron at 6:16 PM on June 15, 2004
hey mwhybark.....hate to be the one to say it, but dirk just gave the official notice that journalista is permanently done for. although he will be doing something similar in the print version of the journal, and there's plenty of comics bloggers picking up the slack. browse here for some good reading in the journalista vein.
posted by cathodeheart at 7:32 PM on June 15, 2004
posted by cathodeheart at 7:32 PM on June 15, 2004
« Older Trial by news conference | Magazine Art. Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
the review of sexy losers was intelligent and priceless.
posted by clango at 1:23 PM on June 15, 2004