Amelie Nothomb's "Sulphuric Acid"
September 14, 2005 10:24 AM Subscribe
Novelist posits Shoah as reality TV show. In her new book titled ’Sulphuric Acid’ published in France, the successful Belgian author Amelie Nothomb describes a “concentration camp reality show”. It's the story of a reality show called “Concentration”. There are ’candidates’ which are arrested in roundups, tattooed and guarded before they are executed one by one following a vote by the spectators.
markesh: Who said it was bad? It's a post, not a callout.
Me, I doubt it's a very good book, but I'm still amused to know that someone wrote it.
posted by nebulawindphone at 10:38 AM on September 14, 2005
Me, I doubt it's a very good book, but I'm still amused to know that someone wrote it.
posted by nebulawindphone at 10:38 AM on September 14, 2005
matteo, thanks I had missed this. It seems a strange book for Nothomb. I've read a couple of her novels, I guess, and I was impressed by how slight they were, in every sense. I can easily imagine a novel about this subject that would ask some interesting, if controversial, questions, but I can't imagine Nothomb having the chops to write it. I tend to think of her novels as cute and pixieish, which is also how I think of her.
posted by OmieWise at 10:59 AM on September 14, 2005
posted by OmieWise at 10:59 AM on September 14, 2005
Un bug dans votre navigateur!
posted by Nahum Tate at 11:00 AM on September 14, 2005
posted by Nahum Tate at 11:00 AM on September 14, 2005
Also, I think you owe somebody some quotes.
posted by Nahum Tate at 11:01 AM on September 14, 2005
posted by Nahum Tate at 11:01 AM on September 14, 2005
Hmm. I have to admit, I've sometimes actually thought that a LOT of people would enjoy this show. Look at the apprentice, for example. People do not watch it to see some people make a Box(tm), they watch it to see people getting fired.
It's the pain and suffering that people want to see.
ASSUMING that there was no critical media. Assuming there were newspaper reporters that CREATE outrage, if such a show suddenly appeared on TV, even though people would be a bit shocked at the start, I'm sure that almost the entire country would watch it.
Look at the popularity of car chases. People die in those shows, but lots and lots of people watch them all the same.
Is boxing not about one guy pounding another guy unconsious? We are not very far away from the gladiator days, and so long we do not evolve, we will never be far away from those days.
And frankly, I've not noticed anyone around me doing any evolving lately.
posted by markesh at 11:04 AM on September 14, 2005
It's the pain and suffering that people want to see.
ASSUMING that there was no critical media. Assuming there were newspaper reporters that CREATE outrage, if such a show suddenly appeared on TV, even though people would be a bit shocked at the start, I'm sure that almost the entire country would watch it.
Look at the popularity of car chases. People die in those shows, but lots and lots of people watch them all the same.
Is boxing not about one guy pounding another guy unconsious? We are not very far away from the gladiator days, and so long we do not evolve, we will never be far away from those days.
And frankly, I've not noticed anyone around me doing any evolving lately.
posted by markesh at 11:04 AM on September 14, 2005
Hugh Downs as a kapo?
posted by alumshubby at 12:16 PM on September 14, 2005
posted by alumshubby at 12:16 PM on September 14, 2005
"Vernon God Little" has a reality show based on death row. The audience gets to pick who dies next.
posted by Eekacat at 12:58 PM on September 14, 2005
posted by Eekacat at 12:58 PM on September 14, 2005
It would be even better if they made it with Japanese school children.
posted by haqspan at 1:40 PM on September 14, 2005
posted by haqspan at 1:40 PM on September 14, 2005
It'd be best if they were quite selective with their contendents: television executives, television evangelists, and politicians. Whoo-hoo, let the good times roll!
posted by five fresh fish at 3:27 PM on September 14, 2005
posted by five fresh fish at 3:27 PM on September 14, 2005
Omiewise: Slight? I've read "Cosmétique de l'ennemi" and "Stupeur et tremblements" (Fear and trembling), and both are pretty dark. Short, surely, and "Fear and trembling" had some silly passages, but there's quite some depth in her work. I certainly don't have any trouble imagining the author of "Cosmétique de l'ennemi" going for this kind of stuff...
posted by Skeptic at 3:31 PM on September 14, 2005
posted by Skeptic at 3:31 PM on September 14, 2005
your sparkle cavalcade of death by robert schiarella was published in 1974 ... from what i recall, it was about a man who accidently killed nontuplets and ended up on a reality tv show where he was to be executed coast to coast ... it was amusing
posted by pyramid termite at 9:01 PM on September 14, 2005
posted by pyramid termite at 9:01 PM on September 14, 2005
Skeptic writes "Short, surely, and 'Fear and trembling' had some silly passages, but there's quite some depth in her work."
I'll have to revisit her. I guess I read F&T and The Book of Proper Names. I didn't dislike them, and I would never confuse short with slight (Appelfeld is one of my favorite authors). I saw the darkness, of course, but I guess I wasn't quite convinced by it, or rather, I felt as if the general tone was cuter than the dark parts would like to suggest. It's that tone that I wonder about, and especially in a context like this where there seems to be secondary gain from writing a shocking book. But I don't think she's a bad person or anything.
posted by OmieWise at 6:55 AM on September 15, 2005
I'll have to revisit her. I guess I read F&T and The Book of Proper Names. I didn't dislike them, and I would never confuse short with slight (Appelfeld is one of my favorite authors). I saw the darkness, of course, but I guess I wasn't quite convinced by it, or rather, I felt as if the general tone was cuter than the dark parts would like to suggest. It's that tone that I wonder about, and especially in a context like this where there seems to be secondary gain from writing a shocking book. But I don't think she's a bad person or anything.
posted by OmieWise at 6:55 AM on September 15, 2005
Het and Houellbecq should burn in hell. In france the promotional process for those two is sickenning.
posted by Sijeka at 12:37 PM on September 15, 2005
posted by Sijeka at 12:37 PM on September 15, 2005
« Older Save Yerkes! | Common base of morality? Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by Rothko at 10:29 AM on September 14, 2005