October 16, 2001
10:02 PM Subscribe
Dust off the bong and the love beads, baby... Digital artist Larry Carlson creates shockwave art that will blow your mind. WARNING: some adult content.
Bust off the dong. Where's the 'adult content' you promised?
posted by pracowity at 1:54 AM on October 17, 2001
posted by pracowity at 1:54 AM on October 17, 2001
OK... Sorry about the repost. I searched MeFi for Larry Carlson and www.larrycarlson.com and got zero hits. What's up with that?
Still... Inspired by the work of Han Hoogerbrugge, I've been checking out Flash artists recently. I stumbled across this link, Flash Forward 2001, and into the Larry Carlson site.
If anybody has any other great Flash art sites tucked away, please post them.
posted by shinybeast at 2:35 AM on October 17, 2001
Still... Inspired by the work of Han Hoogerbrugge, I've been checking out Flash artists recently. I stumbled across this link, Flash Forward 2001, and into the Larry Carlson site.
If anybody has any other great Flash art sites tucked away, please post them.
posted by shinybeast at 2:35 AM on October 17, 2001
Relax, shinybeast. Double-posting will be inevitable until Metafilter's weak search facilities are improved and Metafilter starts checking each post's links against a tree of previously posted URLs.
posted by pracowity at 3:45 AM on October 17, 2001
posted by pracowity at 3:45 AM on October 17, 2001
It's like praystation for stoners.
I dunno though . . . the design is nice, but when you've seen one of the "installments" you've seen them all. Further, (unlike praystation) each section has been created using only the most basic of flash skills. Kids I teach in high school have produced better stuff.
Hence, I'm rather unimpressed.
posted by aladfar at 9:50 AM on October 17, 2001
I dunno though . . . the design is nice, but when you've seen one of the "installments" you've seen them all. Further, (unlike praystation) each section has been created using only the most basic of flash skills. Kids I teach in high school have produced better stuff.
Hence, I'm rather unimpressed.
posted by aladfar at 9:50 AM on October 17, 2001
Where's the 'adult content' you promised?
uh, pracowity? It may have something to do with the naked girl fingering herself. Or the repeated humping noises...
posted by xochi at 9:59 AM on October 17, 2001
uh, pracowity? It may have something to do with the naked girl fingering herself. Or the repeated humping noises...
posted by xochi at 9:59 AM on October 17, 2001
> It may have something to do with the naked girl
> fingering herself. Or the repeated humping noises...
Then 'adult content' here means harmless, mildly erotic imagery. I was afraid the 'adult content' would be violence.
posted by pracowity at 11:01 PM on October 17, 2001
> fingering herself. Or the repeated humping noises...
Then 'adult content' here means harmless, mildly erotic imagery. I was afraid the 'adult content' would be violence.
posted by pracowity at 11:01 PM on October 17, 2001
« Older USPS advice on the Anthrax treat. | Recordnerd.com Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
That was groovy. Now I remember why I come here.
posted by eyeballkid at 10:20 PM on October 16, 2001