Red Means Recording
May 17, 2017 1:05 PM   Subscribe

Jeremy Blake makes music with an op-1 and records the process in a series of hypnotic videos.
posted by empath (22 comments total) 23 users marked this as a favorite
 
These videos make me want the perpetually out of stock $900 OP-1, despite not having a lick of musical talent in me. Or maybe just not wanting to spend the hours involved in really polishing something off? I can't tell which it is.
posted by Kyol at 1:13 PM on May 17, 2017


Kyol, I feel you. I was seduced. I was entranced. I bought one. I have little or no discernible musical talent, though I am a huge music nerd. If you have absolutely no musical talent, and you buy this incredible device, you will have a heck of a good time. You will not, however, suddenly be able to make good music. YMMV. YM probably will not V.
posted by The Bellman at 1:21 PM on May 17, 2017 [4 favorites]


The Bellman did you have experience with other synths/MPCs?
posted by windbox at 1:25 PM on May 17, 2017


I've been sparing myself by buying Pocket Operators and Volcas - cheap musical hits for when I feel like doing something. The problem is the UI is so opaque with them that I always end up spending half my creative time going "wait, how do I do that again?"

But these videos are still super helpful to see how you can go from a blank slate to something fairly finished.
posted by Kyol at 1:25 PM on May 17, 2017


You can step a little more lightly into casual synth music with one of their $50 Pocket Operator variants. I'm partial the to PO-20 Arcade.
posted by CaseyB at 1:28 PM on May 17, 2017 [1 favorite]


windbox I have a bunch of experience with traditional syths, samplers and sequencers, but it's all 30 years out of date. I am old. The OP-1 was the first real music maker I had played with in decades.

Also, yeah, the POs are cheap and tons of fun, but you're right Kyol, I find it impossible to understand why they are making the sounds they make. I think that may actually be the point.
posted by The Bellman at 1:31 PM on May 17, 2017 [1 favorite]


Thanks - was curious. I get the very very very basic fundamentals of an 808 or something but was curious about the ease of use with these things.
posted by windbox at 1:35 PM on May 17, 2017


So the thing I didn't realize until I started poking around the related links on this guy's site was that the reason the PO-2x series sounds so right is that it was designed by a classic chiptune nerd. So it's not just chiptune like, it really does what you'd expect a chiptune sequencer to do.

A yeah, RMR does Pocket Operator tutorials, too. Super helpful if you're intimidated by the hardware.
posted by Kyol at 1:37 PM on May 17, 2017 [1 favorite]


Well, despite loving chiptunes (and never being able to afford one of those), I am afraid I would be unable to make anything but neat sounding garbage.
posted by Samizdata at 1:41 PM on May 17, 2017


I got an OP-1 recently (waited 4 months to get it due to being backordered) and it's really super fun to play with. Watching Red Means Recording's videos is both inspiring, because they're educational, and infuriating, because I just can't be as spontaneous as the videos seem to be. I've made a few nice sounding loops with it but just can't seem to get past that point into making songs. I may not be quite "getting it" yet, but the tape interface just seems too limiting.
posted by zsazsa at 3:57 PM on May 17, 2017


Uggghhhhhh I love these videos so much

Somehow the editing makes it incredibly compelling to watch someone basically just experiment with music and I wind up realizing fifteen minutes later that my intention to put a video on as background music while working instead led to me just watching the whole thing
posted by DoctorFedora at 4:32 PM on May 17, 2017 [1 favorite]


Damn I want an OP-1 SOOOO bad. I fell in love with after discovering what Alessandro Cortini can make with it.

I have a long flight coming up and I'm seriously considering picking up one of the Pocket Operators to play with. I guess that could possibly fill the hole the OP-1 should be filling.

I could always wait for the OP-Z I guess.
posted by Cat Pie Hurts at 4:44 PM on May 17, 2017


If someone needs pocket operator inspiration, here's the PO-2x designer (previously) performing Wintergatan's Marble Machine (previously).

(more PO music by LFT)
posted by effbot at 5:37 PM on May 17, 2017 [1 favorite]


I discovered both this channel and the Pocket Operators about ten days ago. What a pleasant rathole to have fallen into! Now own the PO-12 and PO-14.
posted by Slothrup at 8:45 PM on May 17, 2017


If you want some of the same kicks for quite a bit less money, ios has some ridiculously capable apps - nanostudio is where I'd start.
posted by Sebmojo at 9:31 PM on May 17, 2017


I've been sparing myself by buying Pocket Operators and Volcas - cheap musical hits for when I feel like doing something. The problem is the UI is so opaque with them that I always end up spending half my creative time going "wait, how do I do that again?"

I am a synth geek; I'm equally comfortable editing Yamaha DX series patches, building up stuff from scratch on modular synths, or occasionally writing my own VST plugins. But I find the Pocket Operators too annoying to use.
posted by Foosnark at 7:57 AM on May 18, 2017


I am a synth geek; I'm equally comfortable editing Yamaha DX series patches, building up stuff from scratch on modular synths, or occasionally writing my own VST plugins. But I find the Pocket Operators too annoying to use.

And worse, there are some functions that only exist on some operators, and not just the big obvious ones like chords or sidechaining, but even whether you can live play an instrument or not. I'll spend a few minutes going down a rabbit hole trying to play toms on my po-12 like a synth before realizing I have to do it via parameter automation. I can't imagine how people are managing with the Tonic and the million functions it has.

Still, it's fun, and for $50 it's hard to complain.
posted by Kyol at 8:29 AM on May 18, 2017


groovey. I was a singer in band for ten years. I couldn't play any instrument but I could harmonize and arrange.After the band dissolved I picked up Garageband and used what I'd learned from my buddy musicians to produce this. An ear, composition and harmony with a dash of courage and you're there.
posted by judson at 8:37 AM on May 18, 2017


Rad, rad stuff. I have had trouble getting into any sort of synth workflow over the years but I still think, basically every time I see someone digging in on an OP-1 or something similar, that I should lock myself in a cabin for a couple weeks with one and try to get over the hump with it.
posted by cortex at 8:42 AM on May 18, 2017 [1 favorite]


Hello friends. I am super touched you like the videos. :) If anyone has any questions about OP-1, Pocket Operator, or music stuff, I'm happy to answer. Love talking shop.
posted by jjbbllkk at 9:50 AM on May 18, 2017 [11 favorites]


@jjbbllkk, welcome to Metafilter!

Your videos are hypnotic. I've been enjoying them quite a bit since reading this post.

Do you know any artists who use Pocket Operators to compose vaporwave or synthwave?
posted by rebent at 5:28 AM on May 19, 2017 [1 favorite]


I just noticed that the MoMA store is having a sale for members. So if you pay $85 for a membership (of which $83 is tax deductible), you can get the OP-1 for $680 + $85 = $765. Backordered to early June, but it's probably hard to beat that price and supporting MoMA isn't a bad thing either.

They've also got a good price on the PO-16 Factory.

I'd order the OP-1, but am not willing to face the wrath of my wife.
posted by Slothrup at 6:23 AM on May 20, 2017 [1 favorite]


« Older Economists on the Pipeline Problem in Economics   |   Candy floss and merry-go-rounds Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments