April 23, 2001
9:37 AM Subscribe
Just in time for Earth Day. A colleague forwarded this to me with the subject line "Sac. Bee does expose' on eco-movement!!!", but it doesn't read entirely like that. There's the obligatory "Look how much their CEOs make!" (pdf) as well as a Philanthropic Report Card, rating groups on how much of their budget is spent on a "charitable" purpose. That's the contentious eye candy -- there's also some decent writing. I'm looking forward to reading the rest of the week's stories.
I was a Bee reporter myself 10 years ago; now I'm a professional environmental activist. I've been reading "Environment Inc." and while I agree with a lot it says about high salaries at some of the biggest groups and hype-filled direct mail from membership organizations, he's unfairly tarring the whole movement with his broad brush. The vast majority of environmental non-profits struggle to make the rent and overhead and pay creative, dedicated activists far less than what they could make in the corporate world. If you took the yearly budgets of the 10 big groups targeted by the Bee, the total is about what a mulitnational chemical company spends per hour, so to say that the environmental movement "has become big business" is misleading.
posted by deadline at 1:34 PM on April 24, 2001
posted by deadline at 1:34 PM on April 24, 2001
« Older Fatboy Slim and the Master of Badass | one bad decision after another... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by terrapin at 10:30 AM on April 23, 2001