Popaganda
January 16, 2009 1:55 PM Subscribe
Ron English Interview "How come you're allowed to have private property on public space?" A great nine minute interview with Ron English talking about art, advertising, and censorship and creating work that includes footage of English in action. (via Juxtapoz)
"How come you're allowed to have private property on public space?"
Under certain circumstances, the governmental authority tasked with administering the public space will lease you a limited right to place or affix your property to public property in exchange for a fee. HTH.
posted by Mr. President Dr. Steve Elvis America at 8:23 PM on January 16, 2009
Under certain circumstances, the governmental authority tasked with administering the public space will lease you a limited right to place or affix your property to public property in exchange for a fee. HTH.
posted by Mr. President Dr. Steve Elvis America at 8:23 PM on January 16, 2009
Under certain circumstances, the governmental authority tasked with administering the public space will lease you a limited right to place or affix your property
When a outdoor advertising company is permitted, you're under the corporates rules, in which the First Amendment doesn't apply. Rarely does a municipality regulate the message.
Certain circumstances usually involves safe PSAs from the Ad Council, and certainly not the kind of anti-advertising Ron engages in.
posted by MiltonRandKalman at 8:55 PM on January 16, 2009
When a outdoor advertising company is permitted, you're under the corporates rules, in which the First Amendment doesn't apply. Rarely does a municipality regulate the message.
Certain circumstances usually involves safe PSAs from the Ad Council, and certainly not the kind of anti-advertising Ron engages in.
posted by MiltonRandKalman at 8:55 PM on January 16, 2009
When a outdoor advertising company is permitted, you're under the corporates rules, in which the First Amendment doesn't apply.
It's not that the First Amendment doesn't apply. It just doesn't generally protect expressive defacements of other people's property.
posted by Mr. President Dr. Steve Elvis America at 8:59 PM on January 16, 2009
It's not that the First Amendment doesn't apply. It just doesn't generally protect expressive defacements of other people's property.
posted by Mr. President Dr. Steve Elvis America at 8:59 PM on January 16, 2009
"How come you're allowed to have private property on public space?"
This video has been removed due to some unspecified violation of youtube's terms of use, but my first thought is that you're allowed to have private property on public space because otherwise it'd be a real bitch to find a parking space.
posted by sfenders at 3:10 PM on January 17, 2009
This video has been removed due to some unspecified violation of youtube's terms of use, but my first thought is that you're allowed to have private property on public space because otherwise it'd be a real bitch to find a parking space.
posted by sfenders at 3:10 PM on January 17, 2009
« Older Ibuprofen: serious business | An Inconvenient Historical Event Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by MiltonRandKalman at 2:43 PM on January 16, 2009