Popular: The UK's #1 Hits Reviewed
February 10, 2010 2:10 PM Subscribe
Popular: Every UK #1 single since 1952, reviewed in chronological order by Tom Ewing. He's up to 1987.
I'm really enjoying these reviews. Thanks!
posted by abc123xyzinfinity at 3:24 PM on February 10, 2010
posted by abc123xyzinfinity at 3:24 PM on February 10, 2010
This is massively entertaining, but I don't think the guy can bring himself to praise a Police song without taking a jab at Sting.
posted by Dr.Enormous at 3:31 PM on February 10, 2010
posted by Dr.Enormous at 3:31 PM on February 10, 2010
The guy doing this is a Metafilter user; he raised his hand in this thread six years ago when his project was just starting. Congrats Freakytrigger, you outlasted your Yank counterpart (who bowed out with "Rock Around The Clock" in 1955, archive here).
posted by stupidsexyFlanders at 3:36 PM on February 10, 2010
posted by stupidsexyFlanders at 3:36 PM on February 10, 2010
I came across this a couple of years ago when he was up to about – I think – 1966, and it's great. Always meant to check back, but for some reason didn't. Anyway, it's really perceptive, sharp and entertaining criticism, which is the best kind, and it really comes through that he genuinely loves pop music, and isn't afraid to dig into it.
posted by Len at 3:39 PM on February 10, 2010
posted by Len at 3:39 PM on February 10, 2010
Oh, and someone should give him a book deal for this. Because for all the blog-to-book deals that have happened over the past few years, I can't recall any being as apt, and as well-written, as this.
posted by Len at 3:45 PM on February 10, 2010
posted by Len at 3:45 PM on February 10, 2010
In a show of solidarity I'm going to buy all of these songs off iTunes at one year's worth per week.
Except for the songs by The Beatles and the ones I already have obviously.
posted by Talez at 3:56 PM on February 10, 2010
Except for the songs by The Beatles and the ones I already have obviously.
posted by Talez at 3:56 PM on February 10, 2010
That's great. Really interesting to chart my progression in listening to popular music.
posted by wilful at 4:33 PM on February 10, 2010
posted by wilful at 4:33 PM on February 10, 2010
It's funny to look at this from an American perspective, especially in the 70s and 80s.
It's like:
Yup.
Yup.
Heard that.
Uh-huh.
Who the hell is that?
Yup.
Nice.
Bought that.
Yup.
posted by madajb at 4:52 PM on February 10, 2010
It's like:
Yup.
Yup.
Heard that.
Uh-huh.
Who the hell is that?
Yup.
Nice.
Bought that.
Yup.
posted by madajb at 4:52 PM on February 10, 2010
Now I remember why I stopped listening to the radio about '81.
posted by bonobothegreat at 5:00 PM on February 10, 2010 [1 favorite]
posted by bonobothegreat at 5:00 PM on February 10, 2010 [1 favorite]
This is really good, and the level of erudition in the comments is...intimidating.
posted by Sparx at 5:06 PM on February 10, 2010
posted by Sparx at 5:06 PM on February 10, 2010
I love this kind of stuff. Any excuse to talk about music is a good one in my book. Like most of my favorite critical endeavors, it's often more fun reading the reviews I disagree with than the ones I agree with. I commend him for sticking with it.
posted by Slack-a-gogo at 7:06 PM on February 10, 2010
posted by Slack-a-gogo at 7:06 PM on February 10, 2010
Didn't expect to enjoy this link, but I checked it out, and am hooked! Thanks for posting...
posted by newfers at 8:02 PM on February 10, 2010
posted by newfers at 8:02 PM on February 10, 2010
That reminds me, the UK can go suck a donkey for making American Pie #2 and I'd Like To Teach The World To Sing #1 in January 1972.
posted by Talez at 8:13 PM on February 10, 2010
posted by Talez at 8:13 PM on February 10, 2010
Soooooo, he gave John Lennon's "Imagine" a 2/10? I was starting to think this guy was brilliant! Still love reading his reviews, even though he's dead wrong about Lennon.
posted by newfers at 8:15 PM on February 10, 2010
posted by newfers at 8:15 PM on February 10, 2010
This is great! Bookmarked. : )
posted by SisterHavana at 9:46 PM on February 10, 2010
posted by SisterHavana at 9:46 PM on February 10, 2010
Tom is my favourite music writer of the '00s (and now the '10s, I guess), and Popular has been my main hangout as a commenter for the past year (after a few years as reader), once he reached my own "year of pop" of 1983. It really is one of the landmarks of the web. If you can relate to the UK viewpoint - and some years that will be harder or easier, depending where you're from and how much your charts had in common - you'll find it utterly addictive.
Newfers, even if you might think he's dead wrong about "Imagine", he's rated plenty of Beatles tracks highly and written some brilliant things about them; he wrote the first half of those Beatles remaster reviews for Pitchfork last year. He also writes now for the Guardian.
posted by rory at 3:48 AM on February 11, 2010 [1 favorite]
Newfers, even if you might think he's dead wrong about "Imagine", he's rated plenty of Beatles tracks highly and written some brilliant things about them; he wrote the first half of those Beatles remaster reviews for Pitchfork last year. He also writes now for the Guardian.
posted by rory at 3:48 AM on February 11, 2010 [1 favorite]
This is missing a "magnificent obsessions" tag. I really appreciate a serious run at a giant project that is sustained only by one's own since of completeness and inertia by the end*.
*Like the time in high school when I catalogued all of my ABBA songs by which albums I had them on, and in which languages. It's amazing I ever got a date.
posted by norm at 11:59 AM on February 11, 2010
*Like the time in high school when I catalogued all of my ABBA songs by which albums I had them on, and in which languages. It's amazing I ever got a date.
posted by norm at 11:59 AM on February 11, 2010
« Older 3D TV? | the view from above Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by the bricabrac man at 2:44 PM on February 10, 2010 [3 favorites]