Royal Society of London, 1665–
September 22, 2006 3:26 AM Subscribe
The Royal Society Digital Archive is now on-line and free to use ... until December. Until that time, every article in its collections, going back to 1665, is freely accessible. Poke around, who knows what you might find ... [pdf]
Hell, I'm reading System of the World right now, so this is extra cool!
posted by thanotopsis at 5:16 AM on September 22, 2006
posted by thanotopsis at 5:16 AM on September 22, 2006
I ſurely ſuffer ſo much ſeeing the obſolete long s.
It is ſweet though ſince I can make them with Unicode.
posted by TheOnlyCoolTim at 5:31 AM on September 22, 2006
It is ſweet though ſince I can make them with Unicode.
posted by TheOnlyCoolTim at 5:31 AM on September 22, 2006
Very cool!
posted by Alvy Ampersand at 6:32 AM on September 22, 2006
posted by Alvy Ampersand at 6:32 AM on September 22, 2006
Natural philosophers rock, as does Stephenson's Cycle Baroque.
posted by econous at 6:47 AM on September 22, 2006
posted by econous at 6:47 AM on September 22, 2006
Thank you very much for this link, loved Baroque Cycle, and have been deep-digging the early scientist/alchemists a lot lately.
posted by sonofsamiam at 6:56 AM on September 22, 2006
posted by sonofsamiam at 6:56 AM on September 22, 2006
delmoi: WebGrazer? (Mac)
posted by Devils Rancher at 9:29 AM on September 22, 2006
posted by Devils Rancher at 9:29 AM on September 22, 2006
OOps, meant WebGrabber. Heh.
posted by Devils Rancher at 9:31 AM on September 22, 2006
posted by Devils Rancher at 9:31 AM on September 22, 2006
dammit... wish I had seen this before turning in my thesis. It would have been nice to have the citation:
Boyle, R. (1665). An Account of a Very Odd Monstrous Calf. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1, 10.
Fun
posted by logicpunk at 10:03 AM on September 22, 2006
Boyle, R. (1665). An Account of a Very Odd Monstrous Calf. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1, 10.
Fun
posted by logicpunk at 10:03 AM on September 22, 2006
I wish they would leave the historical stuff available for all to read (such as that published before 1950 or so) Only the last 50 years should be behind a pay wall.
Also, isn't all of this stuff out of copyright at this point anyway?
posted by delmoi at 11:58 AM on September 22, 2006
Also, isn't all of this stuff out of copyright at this point anyway?
posted by delmoi at 11:58 AM on September 22, 2006
So how big is this archive? 100 gigs would correspond to 250 kbytes/page * 1000 pages/year * 400 years. I might throw a couple hundred gigs at it, if it isn't a pain to scrape.
posted by ryanrs at 2:09 AM on September 23, 2006
posted by ryanrs at 2:09 AM on September 23, 2006
Also, isn't all of this stuff out of copyright at this point anyway?
Most of it is, yes. So, in theory, one could make copies of it and post it elsewhere. However, that doesn't mean that the owners of it can't decide to charge to view it (like, say, fine art in a museum).
posted by antifuse at 9:02 AM on September 23, 2006
Most of it is, yes. So, in theory, one could make copies of it and post it elsewhere. However, that doesn't mean that the owners of it can't decide to charge to view it (like, say, fine art in a museum).
posted by antifuse at 9:02 AM on September 23, 2006
« Older the unbearable lightness of being | Will the Next Election be Hacked? Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by antifuse at 4:18 AM on September 22, 2006