MTV plays videos?
September 12, 2001 7:54 PM Subscribe
Let's avoid the easy comments about that being normal operations; it's not actually that bad, usually.
I hadn't noticed there were no VJs, though. Wasn't paying that much attention.
posted by Su at 8:13 PM on September 12, 2001
posted by anildash at 8:20 PM on September 12, 2001
posted by xsquared-1 at 8:27 PM on September 12, 2001
posted by pxe2000 at 8:32 PM on September 12, 2001
posted by bcwinters at 8:33 PM on September 12, 2001
posted by dewelch at 8:42 PM on September 12, 2001
Unfortunately, E! has also continued regular programming. There's something especially unsavoury right now, I think, about Howard Stern continuing with his normal lesbians, strippers and drunken guys schtick.
posted by Dreama at 8:56 PM on September 12, 2001
posted by bargle at 9:17 PM on September 12, 2001
Those are probably old shows. If you listen to his radio show, he is ONLY talking about the attack. Yesterday, he stayed on the air till about noon reporting various eyewitness accounts and information the whole time.
The ones to blame may be E! execs. who are putting the old shows on the air, not necessarily Stern himself.
posted by Rastafari at 9:47 PM on September 12, 2001
posted by likorish at 10:03 PM on September 12, 2001
Indeed, I believe that the longer we have these bowtied knuckleheads speculating wildly, the more we won't be allowed to develop a sense of getting beyond this. Sadly, it looks like the media is going to give this the full Lewinsky/Columbine/McVeigh treatment, sucking all the meaning and reality out of what happened, removing the ability to properly grieve and reflect and replacing it with an increasingly vapid media blitz and "disaster porn" from the cable news channels.
posted by hincandenza at 10:22 PM on September 12, 2001
This was indeed intentional on Viacom's part. They decided little kids didn't need to deal with the drama.
I figured they were going through their playlists to determine what might be a bad idea to show. I was literally seeing the same 6-8 videos over and over and over.
Most music stations - TV and Radio - have, or at least used to have, meticulously detailed plans to be implemented during periods of local or national emergency. They usually start out by going all-news or all-talk, to give an outlet to the audience. Then after a couple days, they start playing music again, but only somber stuff. Then a little more uptempo music gets mixed in for a few days, etc etc, and eventually back to normal.
Rick Sklar, the man who basically invented top 40 radio, wrote a book around 15 years ago called Rocking America. In addition to being a wonderful history of the early years of pop radio in the US (1950s-60s), he goes into some detail about the emergency plans he drew up for WABC-AM when he was running that station (by far the number one station in the country during those years), and how well the plan worked when he had to implement it on 22 Nov 1963.
posted by aaron at 11:57 PM on September 12, 2001
1. If the timing gap between the two planes was deliberate to ensure TV cameras would be there to catch the second impact.
2. All this talk of channel surfing.
Who gives a f*ck what MTV is doing. Get some perspective.
posted by snowgoon at 1:15 AM on September 13, 2001
Because that'll make us all feel better.
I was not directly affected by this, Snowgoon. Skip the patriotic "attack on your country" speech; it's a given. I'm talking family, friends, and my essential posessions. I have other, immediate, things at the moment like joblessness, rent, and someone I cared about having been diagnosed yesterday with Kreutzfeld-Jakob to deal with, and I'd like to get back to those concerns.
I don't really give a fuck what MTV does, nor have I for a long time, but it's good generic audio and visual background noise. If I actually like the music I'm playing, I get distracted listening to it. But the excessive repetition was noticeable, and sparked my curiosity, which was the basis of my comment.
Incidentally, thank you, Aaron for the info on broadcaster's contingency plans. I wasn't aware they were that organized about these things.
posted by Su at 3:05 AM on September 13, 2001
This seems unlikely to me. The attacks were really about as simultaneous as you could possibly expect from two different hijacked planes. There was only a small window between when the first plane crashed and when the authorities would have realized what was going on, so I imagine the hijackers would have tried to get the second plane in there as close as possible to the first one so we wouldn't have time to scramble jets and shoot it down.
posted by straight at 8:49 AM on September 13, 2001
Keep focused, yes. But stay healthy, people.
posted by teradome at 10:21 AM on September 13, 2001 [1 favorite]
« Older understanding the terms used | Fear of flying? Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by jmd82 at 8:13 PM on September 12, 2001