Q&A about Muslims and Arab-Americans
October 2, 2001 8:32 AM Subscribe
Recommended read for all friends who think they need clarifications.
Tiny Tim
Doug Flutie
Frank Zappa
Christie McAulliffe (Space Shuttle Challenger teacher)
Bobby Rahal
Paul Anka (actually Canadian)
Tiffany
G.E. Smith
Salma Hayek
posted by cell divide at 9:00 AM on October 2, 2001
A M E R I C A N.
The hypenated prefix only perpetuates a mentality of racism and segregation.
posted by eljuanbobo at 10:06 AM on October 2, 2001
posted by RavinDave at 10:30 AM on October 2, 2001
Well said! Otherwise you'd all be hyphenated, starting with the English-Americans. The great think about the U.S. is that everybody is hyphenated so the hyphen should indeed be invisible.
Hyphenating is anti-American. And even this hyphen should be outlawed as well.
Thanks all for the links.
P.S. Are links the hyphens of the Internet?
posted by MiguelCardoso at 10:37 AM on October 2, 2001
posted by mrbula at 10:53 AM on October 2, 2001
you should not use a hyphenated prefix before "American". African American? not unless you were born there. American of African Heritage? sure. Same with any group.
I think the hyphenation is intended more as an abbreviation of "American of <insert ancestral origin here> Heritage." I really don't see it as a distancing mechanism. Its entirely possible to be American ideologically (i.e., rule of law, equality etc.) and simultaneously maintain one's culture and/or ethnicity.
America has no culture of its own historically. All of it was brought here from somewhere else, with the exception of the native tribal cultures. So what if someone wants to identify publicly with both? That's the sort of freedom that makes America what it is.
I envy people who know their ancestry. I wish I knew my own, it would give me some sense of identity other than "consumer."
posted by zodiac at 12:31 PM on October 2, 2001
posted by signal at 12:31 PM on October 2, 2001
Some of us prefer to make it up as we go along.
posted by rushmc at 5:00 PM on October 2, 2001
posted by allaboutgeorge at 5:19 PM on October 2, 2001
Just curious...does keeping it on?
I don't understand the rationale of blaming the vast majority, who would never dream of assaulting an Arab-American in imagined retaliation for the terrorist acts of (dead) Islamic extremists, for the actions of those few stupids who do. It seems to me that, in doing so, those doing the blaming merely create resentment and turn their natural allies against them.
posted by rushmc at 5:23 PM on October 2, 2001
posted by allaboutgeorge at 5:43 PM on October 2, 2001
No, keeping it on doesn't stop anyone committed to messing with me. People who do so don't quibble over labels; they just go on what they see (difference). I'll concede this, though: The folks whom you call stupids don't present the standard by which I want to judge all Americans and allies against racism and terrorism.
posted by allaboutgeorge at 5:48 PM on October 2, 2001
Oddly, that is something that I share with them. I don't put any stock in labels either. I go on what I see, too. But it's not difference that I look for, which is where I (critically) differ.
Not everyone will be motivated to overcome their longstanding prejudices in a rush to recognize and embrace ALL Americans as Americans, clearly. Some may. I would hope, at least, that recent events would give some pause to consider the costs of irrational hate.
posted by rushmc at 7:40 PM on October 2, 2001
« Older Strom Thurmond collapses in Senate. | Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by mrbula at 8:46 AM on October 2, 2001