Salt Lake City,
October 24, 2001 4:17 PM Subscribe
Salt Lake City, host of the 2002 Winter Olympics, received a surprise when IOC member Gerhard Heiberg suggested maybe the 2002 games shouldn't go on as planned. He later retracted his remarks, but I think he made a valid point. Should a country be hosting the Olympics while at war?
There is always a war going on somewhere... what better way to thumb our noses at the carnage than to celebrate the family of nations?
The issue of not holding the games was actually floated here (in SLC), but was quickly dismissed.
posted by silusGROK at 5:26 PM on October 24, 2001
The issue of not holding the games was actually floated here (in SLC), but was quickly dismissed.
posted by silusGROK at 5:26 PM on October 24, 2001
There's a difference between holding the games while there's a war somewhere and holding the games in a nation that is directly, actively involved in an military conflict. Right now we are facing a foe that delights in their sneaky, devious and underhanded methodology. They have threatened to bring violence to us in any strategic location they can reach. They have shown an obvious willingness to murder innocent civilians to attempt to prove their point.
The games may not be cancelled, nor will the World Series, Super Bowl or other large, massively publicised event which will draw a huge crowd on-site and a television audience in the hundreds of millions. But you wouldn't find me at any of them for anything, and I know that I'm not alone in that conviction.
posted by Dreama at 7:14 PM on October 24, 2001
The games may not be cancelled, nor will the World Series, Super Bowl or other large, massively publicised event which will draw a huge crowd on-site and a television audience in the hundreds of millions. But you wouldn't find me at any of them for anything, and I know that I'm not alone in that conviction.
posted by Dreama at 7:14 PM on October 24, 2001
I'll be working at the Games... and I'm not worried a bit. Come... don't come... it's your choice, of course. But we'll have fun either way.
posted by silusGROK at 7:27 AM on October 25, 2001
posted by silusGROK at 7:27 AM on October 25, 2001
And were the Berlin Games cancelled? No...
Were they at war in 1936? No...
posted by dagnyscott at 7:46 AM on October 25, 2001
Were they at war in 1936? No...
posted by dagnyscott at 7:46 AM on October 25, 2001
Um... "March 7, 1936 - Nazis occupy the Rhineland"... sounds like war to me. Sure, the US wasn't in on it for a few more years, but that shouldn't restrict our recollection of history.
Source: Holocaust Timeline
posted by silusGROK at 9:56 AM on October 25, 2001
Source: Holocaust Timeline
posted by silusGROK at 9:56 AM on October 25, 2001
Before the beginning of the [ancient] Olympic festival, all Greek cities suspended hostilities for a prescribed period. Greeks called this truce "ekecheiria", that is, the holding of hands and the break of hostilities.
posted by Carol Anne at 10:08 AM on October 25, 2001
posted by Carol Anne at 10:08 AM on October 25, 2001
Before the beginning of the [ancient] Olympic festival, all Greek cities suspended hostilities for a prescribed period. Greeks called this truce "ekecheiria", that is, the holding of hands and the break of hostilities.
posted by Carol Anne at 10:08 AM on October 25, 2001
posted by Carol Anne at 10:08 AM on October 25, 2001
Sorry about the double post!
posted by Carol Anne at 10:10 AM on October 25, 2001
posted by Carol Anne at 10:10 AM on October 25, 2001
« Older The 2002 Demotivators | It's official: ACLU hates the new anti-terrorism... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by donkeyschlong at 5:23 PM on October 24, 2001