wired
April 5, 2002 4:29 AM Subscribe
wired on mar 28, wired.com say Privacy Gets Some Respect.... April 2, a completely different theory. inconsistent magazine? or both sides of the story?
bliss, I would say it's rather a magazine looking at an inconsistent world.
posted by dhartung at 8:20 AM on April 5, 2002
posted by dhartung at 8:20 AM on April 5, 2002
Here's the obligatory comment pointing out that Wired News (the Web site) has nothing to do with Wired (the magazine), except that a few years ago they used to be run by the same company. Even then, though, they were separate editorial operations.
posted by jjg at 9:09 AM on April 5, 2002
posted by jjg at 9:09 AM on April 5, 2002
if you read the two articles, they're distinguishable in that the first deals with a decrease in information gathering through hidden cookies, while the second deals with an increase in spam and spyware. i see no reason that these two situations would be mutually exclusive or even contradictory of one another - simply two trends occurring in different aspects of the marketplace. major sites that draw visitors collecting those visitors' data is a whole different concept from some company i've never heard of spying on me when i install kazaa. the first is a violation of trust (which i'm glad to hear are decreasing); the second is violation, plain and simple. and that's scary.
either way, i think wired.com is just doing its job, well as always.
posted by ab3 at 9:34 AM on April 5, 2002
either way, i think wired.com is just doing its job, well as always.
posted by ab3 at 9:34 AM on April 5, 2002
« Older Utah Judge Rules Medical Pot is In | Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by jcterminal at 4:37 AM on April 5, 2002