Patently Absurd.
June 5, 2000 6:34 AM Subscribe
Patently Absurd. James Gleick, chaos researcher and all-around smart guy, has written a very nice piece for the New York Times Magazine about the current spate of stupidity at the US Patent and Trademark Office.
Most important, in my view, is that unlike the John Perry Barlow piece we discussed earlier, the Gleick piece got national press... which is far more important than we geeks think...
Most important, in my view, is that unlike the John Perry Barlow piece we discussed earlier, the Gleick piece got national press... which is far more important than we geeks think...
I failed to follow my own law. I'd been going to make a pissy comment about copyright... not realizing that it was his own page. Thanks.
posted by baylink at 11:40 AM on June 5, 2000
posted by baylink at 11:40 AM on June 5, 2000
Because failing to notice that fact doesn't demonstrate either of those qualities. Next question?
posted by baylink at 7:56 AM on June 6, 2000
posted by baylink at 7:56 AM on June 6, 2000
questions2:
who said you could answer? of course youre not going to admit that you are what you are, that would be way to realistic for the great Jay R. Ashworth.
posted by sikk at 9:44 AM on June 6, 2000
who said you could answer? of course youre not going to admit that you are what you are, that would be way to realistic for the great Jay R. Ashworth.
posted by sikk at 9:44 AM on June 6, 2000
« Older peterme's bathroom | You have GOT to be kidding . . . Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by lbergstr at 9:41 AM on June 5, 2000