The Winners of Astronomy Photographer Of The Year 2022
August 15, 2023 2:32 PM   Subscribe

An online gallery for the winners of Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2022 From the Sombrero Galaxy to a moon gleaming next to a skyscraper, to misty green rivers under the aurora borealis and the sun's rays rendered as tree rings, these images brought a dose of wonder to me today
posted by MarianHalcombe (14 comments total) 37 users marked this as a favorite
 
What an amazing universe we live in!

Great stuff
posted by Windopaene at 3:26 PM on August 15, 2023


I love them all, but that moon shot is amazing.
posted by mollweide at 5:09 PM on August 15, 2023


How do you even get a moon shot like that?

[reads description]

"Home-built 444 mm Dobsonian Newtonian reflector telescope"

Well damn.
posted by clawsoon at 5:43 PM on August 15, 2023 [2 favorites]


Gorgeous work!

Wow, the ISS there.
posted by doctornemo at 6:04 PM on August 15, 2023


Love it! Wish I was in Greenwich to see them up close.
posted by kingdead at 6:18 PM on August 15, 2023


That aurora shot is amazing.
posted by azpenguin at 8:01 PM on August 15, 2023


Amazing! I wonder how the clouds look only slightly blurred in "Stabbing into the Stars" by Zihui Hu. Is it a composite or did the clouds just come out that way?
posted by TheophileEscargot at 9:32 PM on August 15, 2023


Absolutely stunning. Would love to be in a room full of huge prints of these and just bask in the universe.
posted by obfuscation at 6:03 AM on August 16, 2023


More stunners on each shortlist, too. Thanks so much, OP!
posted by Iris Gambol at 11:34 AM on August 16, 2023


From the "people and space" shortlist: Stacks and Stones By Derek Horlock

Anyone know why the stars seem to have a dark shadow that makes them look like Braille points?

(I'm thinking that some heavy-handed digital manipulation was done to get the foreground and sky to be both well exposed. It makes the photo sort of different and interesting--but flawed, in my final opinion.)
posted by polecat at 5:02 PM on August 16, 2023


(I'm thinking that some heavy-handed digital manipulation was done to get the foreground and sky to be both well exposed. It makes the photo sort of different and interesting--but flawed, in my final opinion.)

My impression is that every astrophotography photo you see has been heavily processed. The photographers will talk about the many, many hours they put into the photos to get them to look interesting. Everybody from people at NASA down to random dudes with Youtube channels will talk about the importance of processing the photo so that it tells a story, and that it's as much of an art as capturing the photos is a science.
posted by clawsoon at 5:15 PM on August 16, 2023 [1 favorite]


I wish I understood the "solar tree" image...is it the sun? Composition related to an actual tree? The image isn't explained.
posted by tiny frying pan at 7:12 AM on August 17, 2023 [1 favorite]


These photographs are astonishing. I'm definitely going to book a ticket to see this exhibition. Thank you for sharing this.
posted by essexjan at 8:33 AM on August 17, 2023 [1 favorite]


Hopefully you already know about NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day and check it daily. A full archive (back to its inception in 1995) is available.
posted by neuron at 12:12 PM on August 18, 2023 [1 favorite]


« Older "...made her look either ethereal or like a glazed...   |   Double secret probation. Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments