The Register has an article
June 28, 2000 5:57 PM Subscribe
The Register has an article describing how Oracle hired thugs to prove that Micro$oft did indeed back/finance users groups, watchdog groups, and other entities. (found on the Hacker News Network)
Why was it boneheaded? Does this somehow hurt Oracle's reputation? Everyone who deals with them already knows that Oracle is probably the most thuggish company in the computer industry, so this sort of behavior is par for the course with them. Besides, as it turns out the investigative firm that Oracle hired has also worked for Microsoft and for AOL in the past.
posted by rafeco at 6:51 AM on June 29, 2000
posted by rafeco at 6:51 AM on June 29, 2000
This just cracks me up... Ellison has never been anything but a low-rent, no-class version of Gates, and now he's got the embarrassing revelations to prove it. And as Rafeco pointed out, there's no "Oracle reptuation" to damage, since they're the pond scum of the business software industry. Ellison's pathological desire to beat Gates at any cost ("I'm the richest man in the world and Gates isn't! Uhm... yeah, well, if you only count our software companies...") has forced Oracle down lame-brained paths in the past; obviously, it will continue to do so.
posted by m.polo at 7:18 AM on June 29, 2000
posted by m.polo at 7:18 AM on June 29, 2000
Leave it to Salon to give an alternate take on the situation.
Myself, I just see two rich boneheads butting heads.
posted by solistrato at 8:26 AM on June 29, 2000
Myself, I just see two rich boneheads butting heads.
posted by solistrato at 8:26 AM on June 29, 2000
« Older UK more crime-ridden than US? | The New-Boy Network Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by mikewas at 8:07 PM on June 28, 2000