buk buk buk buk buk buk says I love you
October 3, 2003 11:09 AM Subscribe
Chickens Prefer Beautiful Humans. Suggests that human preferences arise from general properties of nervous systems, rather than from face-specific adaptations, in other words sorry fuglies, it's not socially constructed. N.b this research received a 2003 Ig Nobel Prize.
The government also recommends duck rape in the unlikely event of a biological or chemical attack launched by Hanna Barbera dogs.
posted by condour75 at 11:29 AM on October 3, 2003
posted by condour75 at 11:29 AM on October 3, 2003
They're *chickens*, you dolt. Apart from you, they're the most stupid creatures on this planet.
posted by t r a c y at 11:48 AM on October 3, 2003
posted by t r a c y at 11:48 AM on October 3, 2003
sorry fuglies, it's not socially constructed
My one crumb of comfort, and now science crushes even that beneath its unfeeling heel.
*cries*
posted by sennoma at 11:51 AM on October 3, 2003
My one crumb of comfort, and now science crushes even that beneath its unfeeling heel.
*cries*
posted by sennoma at 11:51 AM on October 3, 2003
Chickens Prefer Beautiful Humans.
Taht's just a side effect of the whole Frank Perdue thing.
posted by jonmc at 11:51 AM on October 3, 2003
Taht's just a side effect of the whole Frank Perdue thing.
posted by jonmc at 11:51 AM on October 3, 2003
Studies show chickens prefer beautiful humans who feed them corn and don't decapitate/eat them right away.
posted by Shane at 11:58 AM on October 3, 2003
posted by Shane at 11:58 AM on October 3, 2003
For a great read filled with stuff like this, check out Survival of the Prettiest.
My favorite factoid: women's faces become measurably more symmetrical during ovulation.
posted by alms at 12:11 PM on October 3, 2003
My favorite factoid: women's faces become measurably more symmetrical during ovulation.
posted by alms at 12:11 PM on October 3, 2003
I have no background in this stuff. Does this mean that chickens want to fuck my girl?
posted by Postroad at 12:16 PM on October 3, 2003
posted by Postroad at 12:16 PM on October 3, 2003
> They're *chickens*, you dolt. Apart from you, they're the
> most stupid creatures on this planet.
Yeah, I know. All mine ever talk about is Jaques Derrida, and sometimes Beyonce and Halle Berry. Never a syllable about mathematical physics.
posted by jfuller at 12:28 PM on October 3, 2003
> most stupid creatures on this planet.
Yeah, I know. All mine ever talk about is Jaques Derrida, and sometimes Beyonce and Halle Berry. Never a syllable about mathematical physics.
posted by jfuller at 12:28 PM on October 3, 2003
so how come those chickens bother with Gonzo? You'd think they'd be frog marching.
posted by condour75 at 1:10 PM on October 3, 2003
posted by condour75 at 1:10 PM on October 3, 2003
If chickens don't have lips, how can they say "buk buk buk"?
posted by mr_crash_davis at 1:12 PM on October 3, 2003
posted by mr_crash_davis at 1:12 PM on October 3, 2003
Chickens Prefer Beautiful Humans
That's because the beautiful people usually live on seafood, steaks and other expensive kinds of meat, thereby saving chickens from the frying pan.
posted by 111 at 1:47 PM on October 3, 2003
That's because the beautiful people usually live on seafood, steaks and other expensive kinds of meat, thereby saving chickens from the frying pan.
posted by 111 at 1:47 PM on October 3, 2003
It' only fair because - humans prefer beautifull chickens.
posted by troutfishing at 7:21 PM on October 3, 2003
posted by troutfishing at 7:21 PM on October 3, 2003
It' only fair because - humans prefer beautifull chickens.
No, just the tasty ones.
posted by krazykity16 at 9:05 PM on October 3, 2003
No, just the tasty ones.
posted by krazykity16 at 9:05 PM on October 3, 2003
Didja know chickens don't have asses, phoodz? Weird but true.
They do, however, have teeth. Briefly.
posted by five fresh fish at 11:29 PM on October 3, 2003
They do, however, have teeth. Briefly.
posted by five fresh fish at 11:29 PM on October 3, 2003
Possibly everything that reproduces sexually prefers aesthetically pleasing partners and environment, and defines aesthetically pleasing in broadly the same way: symmetrical, 'bright', not worn by time.
Which goes for our and their tastes in art and furniture too. Chickens would probably prefer to eat shiny, symmetrical food from a shiny, symmetrical bowl, given the choice.
posted by aeschenkarnos at 3:17 AM on October 4, 2003
Which goes for our and their tastes in art and furniture too. Chickens would probably prefer to eat shiny, symmetrical food from a shiny, symmetrical bowl, given the choice.
posted by aeschenkarnos at 3:17 AM on October 4, 2003
aeschenkarnos, I'm with you on the first and third aesthetic criteria, but what do you mean by 'bright'?
posted by Slithy_Tove at 6:44 AM on October 4, 2003
posted by Slithy_Tove at 6:44 AM on October 4, 2003
It's all true.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 8:12 AM on October 4, 2003
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 8:12 AM on October 4, 2003
but what do you mean by 'bright'?
Chickens prefer people with a naturalistic worldview.
posted by kindall at 10:19 AM on October 4, 2003
Chickens prefer people with a naturalistic worldview.
posted by kindall at 10:19 AM on October 4, 2003
« Older The Virtual Truck Route | Painkillers destroy hearing Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by ptermit at 11:16 AM on October 3, 2003