Dear Penthouse, I never thought this kind of thing actually happened, but...
March 7, 2004 12:10 PM   Subscribe

Pornography. [SFW]
posted by Hildago (17 comments total)


 
That was kind of hot. And creepy. And not really SFW.
posted by gwint at 12:24 PM on March 7, 2004


OMG! My parents just walked in on me!
posted by crazy finger at 12:51 PM on March 7, 2004


Still waiting for the "release".
posted by aaronscool at 1:00 PM on March 7, 2004


Yeah, where is the money shot?
posted by Steve_at_Linnwood at 1:04 PM on March 7, 2004


That is in fact not safe for work.
posted by Outlawyr at 1:47 PM on March 7, 2004


I had posted that site on my blog. It is all posing in different "erotic" positions but nada takes place that one can see...Very stagey stuff, alas...guy with hands on hip seems a bit bored by it all.Andnow for the more serious post-mod interpretation: a number of guys with one chick=homo erotic; a number of girls with one guy=hetero erotic.
posted by Postroad at 1:53 PM on March 7, 2004


Tents his pants,
looks down,
shakes big head,
and thinks,

God, I am so fucking glandular...
posted by Opus Dark at 2:07 PM on March 7, 2004


Or... God, I am so glandular fucking...
ruh roh. used it as a verb again...
posted by wendell at 2:18 PM on March 7, 2004


I shudder to think what the NSFW version of this would be.

Good post.
posted by scarabic at 2:19 PM on March 7, 2004


Actually, they look like a bunch of Gap ads to me... except that they draw more attention to the clothing...
posted by wendell at 2:21 PM on March 7, 2004


I found this on the same site.
posted by mert at 2:44 PM on March 7, 2004


I'm kind of comforted to see I am not the only one who got a bit... distracted... by these pictures.

And I am glad that my days of being summoned to the blackboard are long in the past.
posted by John Smallberries at 4:17 PM on March 7, 2004


This showed up at memepool recently, with that link. Unfortutely there is no way to comment at memepool.

This is stolen content, I believe. As far as I can tell it is a straight-up ripoff of a French artist's work found here, which I linked to on my sidebar about a month ago.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 4:41 PM on March 7, 2004


I must confess.. I first saw it here, and that's the link that's been spreading over the Web.
posted by wendell at 5:37 PM on March 7, 2004


Actually quite hilarious. The absurdity of porn and the way we think about sex is apparent in these pics.
posted by ziklagz at 6:57 PM on March 7, 2004


brrrriliiant.
posted by mcsweetie at 7:54 PM on March 7, 2004


Brilliant indeed. Obvious, original (at least for me) and tought provoking.

On preview: ziklagz: why absurdity of porn ? That's mimic of porn, it's not actual porn. The mimic makes porn look absurd ?
posted by elpapacito at 7:42 AM on March 8, 2004


« Older O'Leary's cow, or comet?   |   Intruders in the House of Saud, Part I: The Jihadi... Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments