Pretty Polluted
June 10, 2004 11:37 AM Subscribe
Visualizing power plant impact. A nice use of flash to show the impact of electricity generation around the USA. You can zoom in on individual states and then individual power plants. Or you can view the national impact of several regulatory regimes.
The scale of the power production equipment to me has always been defined by those stats showing pollution in millions of tons of carbon dioxide.
That really does seem like a very large volume of any gas, doesn't it?
posted by dglynn at 12:42 PM on June 10, 2004
That really does seem like a very large volume of any gas, doesn't it?
posted by dglynn at 12:42 PM on June 10, 2004
Funny it said Ca. has is one of the cleanest states but feels the effects from other states. Looking at the map, how do those winds cross over the Great Divide, The Rocky Mountains? My state, Texas is the highest yet the colors on the map show a different tale other than it has the largest area mapped.
Not sure what to figure out from this map. The northern states have the worst colors. The majority of the problem exits where the civil war took place.
posted by thomcatspike at 12:47 PM on June 10, 2004
Not sure what to figure out from this map. The northern states have the worst colors. The majority of the problem exits where the civil war took place.
posted by thomcatspike at 12:47 PM on June 10, 2004
What do we do with the waste?
Snotty answer: if we treat it as we do similarly harmful waste that's not tainted with neutrons, we leave it in big piles wherever.
Really: you reprocess most of it. What's left -- the really nasty stuff -- you put someplace people aren't likely to go accidentally, or encase and drop into subduction trenches to get sucked into the mantle if you're confident you won't want the stuff sometime in the next few hundred years. As long as it's net better than coal, switching is smart.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 5:52 PM on June 10, 2004
Snotty answer: if we treat it as we do similarly harmful waste that's not tainted with neutrons, we leave it in big piles wherever.
Really: you reprocess most of it. What's left -- the really nasty stuff -- you put someplace people aren't likely to go accidentally, or encase and drop into subduction trenches to get sucked into the mantle if you're confident you won't want the stuff sometime in the next few hundred years. As long as it's net better than coal, switching is smart.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 5:52 PM on June 10, 2004
where's the leadership on conservation? for christ's sake...
posted by specialk420 at 8:32 PM on June 10, 2004
posted by specialk420 at 8:32 PM on June 10, 2004
« Older Forget iTunes... | Garé! Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
trharlan, interesting. What do we do with the waste?
posted by hackly_fracture at 12:16 PM on June 10, 2004