Other countries
November 10, 2000 5:47 AM Subscribe
Other countries are looking at us and giggling about our democratic process. It's rather enlightening to see what they think, provided the attitude the US newsmedia takes when other countries' elections appear "fixed", "inefficient," or "ineffective."
The Washington Post published a small article today that mentions that had such irregularities occurred in other countries that the U.S. would have asked the Organization of American States (OAS) to send in election monitors, and in most cases would have called for a re-vote in situations such as the one in Florida.
posted by terrapin at 10:18 AM on November 10, 2000
posted by terrapin at 10:18 AM on November 10, 2000
Yeah, I hear that Peru is threatening not to trade with us because they consider our election invalid.
posted by grimmelm at 10:24 AM on November 10, 2000
posted by grimmelm at 10:24 AM on November 10, 2000
Its not just other countries, I work for a Canadian citizen who is originally from Vietnam, he keeps saying its just like a thrid world country.
posted by mutagen at 12:44 PM on November 10, 2000
posted by mutagen at 12:44 PM on November 10, 2000
Well, the "banana republic" jokes were already flying fast and furious back during the Elian flap. When the outcome of the US elections hinges on Florida, what do you expect?
posted by grimmelm at 1:02 PM on November 10, 2000
posted by grimmelm at 1:02 PM on November 10, 2000
A self-described British cynic has an idea to elect the POTUS.
“Why not this radical idea - have a nation-wide vote where the most popular candidate loses. Then scrap the nation-wide result in favour of one chosen state. Have a ballot in which half the populace can't understand the ballot paper then lose most of the remaining ballot boxes Finally and most importantly ensure that anyone who doesn't like the governor's big brother is kept well away from the polling booths. Whoever gains a simple majority of the remaining three votes wins!”
He’s at the bottom.
posted by capt.crackpipe at 1:10 PM on November 10, 2000
“Why not this radical idea - have a nation-wide vote where the most popular candidate loses. Then scrap the nation-wide result in favour of one chosen state. Have a ballot in which half the populace can't understand the ballot paper then lose most of the remaining ballot boxes Finally and most importantly ensure that anyone who doesn't like the governor's big brother is kept well away from the polling booths. Whoever gains a simple majority of the remaining three votes wins!”
He’s at the bottom.
posted by capt.crackpipe at 1:10 PM on November 10, 2000
« Older New top level domains? | Math Against Tyranny... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Uh, i just made that up. But ...
posted by dhartung at 10:11 AM on November 10, 2000