From the U.S. Mint, one year later:
February 19, 2001 11:24 AM Subscribe
posted by kokogiak at 11:28 AM on February 19, 2001
posted by pnevares at 11:29 AM on February 19, 2001
posted by briank at 11:29 AM on February 19, 2001
posted by Dreama at 11:39 AM on February 19, 2001
I've also been able to get them from the bank on occaision. To my knowledge, you can drop off a 20 or a 50, and get a roll of them.
Try flipping them to homeless folks on the street - you'll feel all sorts of superior.
posted by aladfar at 11:43 AM on February 19, 2001
The mint is going to have to totally flood the country with these things to get people to let go of their concept of artificially induced shortage-based value.
You will not get filthy rich by hanging on to old issues of TV guide, Franklin Mint plates, or every collectable coin marketed on Saturday afternoon TV.
Beanie babies, anyone?
Although I did keep one Delaware quarter, because that's where I'm from and we were first, dang it!
posted by jennyb at 11:43 AM on February 19, 2001
She said that banks have been very slow to embrace them and give them out to people, which is why they're not in heavy circulation. The Mint then said they'd circumvent the banks and take it straight to places like 7-11, and the banks flipped out at that, too, because they feel it's their job to distribute currency.
Personally, I still like the old paper dollars. The last thing I want is more change in my wallet.
posted by bgluckman at 11:47 AM on February 19, 2001
posted by physics at 11:49 AM on February 19, 2001
posted by megnut at 11:53 AM on February 19, 2001
posted by crog at 11:55 AM on February 19, 2001
posted by howa2396 at 11:56 AM on February 19, 2001
posted by scout at 12:00 PM on February 19, 2001
i like them. (meg, you're not alone!) i think they're especially convenient in transit situations -- buses here cost $1.60 and it's just easier to get a bunch of change out of my wallet than to get the change, then the bill, then snap the billfold closed ...
posted by maura at 12:01 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by rdr at 12:16 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by jdunn_entropy at 12:22 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by sonofsamiam at 12:23 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by xsquared-1 at 12:25 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by jpoulos at 12:27 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by sugarfish at 1:02 PM on February 19, 2001
this sounds familiar ...
posted by maura at 1:08 PM on February 19, 2001
There's nothing that says "I'm really hard up" like paying for purchases with a handful of change. I spent too much of my impoverished youth holding up checkout lines with counting out loose change for various small purchases to feel really comfortable with standing at a cash register and reaching into my jeans pocket to pull out that handful of assorted change, digging through the pennies and nickels looking for the *big* change.
Sure, it's petty, superficial, and stupid, but I'd bet a whole *pile* of that pretty golden money on this very thing being a part of the reason the coins are slow to catch on.
Coinstar says a full two-thirds of respondents to a survey done last year were going to save their golden dollar coins. Myself, I'd rather just take them to the nearest Coinstar machine and trade them for green money.
posted by Sapphireblue at 1:10 PM on February 19, 2001
I have yet to even lay eyes on one of these dollars. Woe! The south is so sedentary, it'll never take here!
posted by mblandi at 1:19 PM on February 19, 2001
I just remembered another one: Scroll down to Susan B. Anthony.
posted by sonofsamiam at 1:22 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by gluechunk at 1:34 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by delfuego at 1:48 PM on February 19, 2001
it's odd to see the mint security check employees out as they go to work. they break out the mirrors and check under the entire car, trunk, engine, everything. probably throw in a good full body search as well. i wonder if maybe, just maybe any of those employees snag a sheet or two of bens and get away with it. would be close to impossible, but ya never know.
posted by physics at 1:54 PM on February 19, 2001
I inflict them on everyone I know. Of course, I also keep a bunch of two dollar bills around to use as tips, so I might be a bit of an odd currency buff. You shoulda seen me when the new hundreds first came out. Big faces on bills = big grin on my face.
I guess they haven't hit the rest of the country as quickly as NYC, but they're definitely circulating here, thanks to (as mentioned above) our mass transit system's embrace of the coins. Sure beats those Susan B. Yucky pseudo-octagonal quarter-lookin' monstrosities that they replaced.
posted by anildash at 1:54 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by anildash at 1:56 PM on February 19, 2001
Then again, the US is saddled with the copper penny, the world's most useless coin, which goes a long way towards devaluing the notion of coinage in general. The sooner it follows the Netherlands and rounds (up or down) to the nearest 5 cents, the better.
posted by holgate at 2:34 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by girlhacker at 2:37 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by Optamystic at 2:41 PM on February 19, 2001
We've had $1 coins in Canada since somewhere around 1990, and $2 coins in Canada since 1995 or 1996, and they're great.
I hated pulling a wad of bills from my wallet and finding out I had $11, it was a complete shock. Dollar coins are tremendously convenient.
posted by cCranium at 2:41 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by aaron at 2:44 PM on February 19, 2001
If anyone would like, I can post a .jpg of me rolling around in them Scrooge McDuck style.
posted by thirteen at 2:48 PM on February 19, 2001
You'll know you have the right answer if it seems a little bit surreal.
posted by jbushnell at 2:57 PM on February 19, 2001
jbushnell: Is the SBA the dollar with the eagle landing on the moon on the back? I always thought that was odd. Why don't they put a little-bitty space helmet on it? But I digress...
posted by ChrisTN at 3:02 PM on February 19, 2001
Interesting Susan B. Anthony factoid: It was a coin that failed because nobody wanted to use it. And yet in 1999 the Mint was forced to put out about 30 million new ones because they were running out. Same deal as with the Sacagaweas: People get them in government vending machines, they take them home, and the coins never see circulation again.
posted by aaron at 3:14 PM on February 19, 2001
Coins are a never-ending nuisance. I'm always trying to get rid of them and am never quite able to keep up. They weigh down my pockets, jingle awkwardly, and clutter up everything they come in contact with. It is more work trying to find creative ways to spend pennies than the coins themselves are worth (when was the last time you encountered a vending machine that accepted them?). When I last moved, I dug up some three pounds of coins laying around on closets, countertops, and other nooks - I'm convinced they breed when we're not looking. It took ages to get rid of them all. I've never been a fan of the "tipping" system or of panhandling, but I now routinely dump change into tip jars and give it to anyone who asks me for it just as a means of foisting the hassle of dealing with coins off on someone else.
The Mint is going the wrong direction with this Sacagawea dollar. What we really need are 25-cent bills. THAT would make me happy.
-Mars
posted by Mars Saxman at 3:46 PM on February 19, 2001
The government would save lots of money if people converted to $1 coins and $2 bills. (It being agreed that $1 coins are too heavy to carry en masse, and the $5 bill being too large a denomination to be the smallest bill).
Interesting note: the Sacajewa Dollar is an exact replacement of the Susan B. Anthony dollar: at the instance of vending machine / change machine operators, who loved the efficiency of dollar coints, it has the same weight, diameter, width, and electromagnetic characteristics as the Susan B. Anthony...
posted by MattD at 4:03 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by holgate at 4:18 PM on February 19, 2001
All the vending machines around campus (and in high school, too) accept pennies.
posted by gleemax at 4:35 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by jbushnell at 4:44 PM on February 19, 2001
...all of which were directly listed as reasons nobody wanted to use the Susan B. Anthony: weight, diameter, width (well, not electromagnetic characteristics). It felt just like a quarter to most people, and looked like one too, if you weren't paying attention or just had bad eyes. So many people were confused by them that they just said "the hell with it." The only improvement the Sacawagea coin has over the Anthony is its color, and that's not enough.
And yeah, most new vending machines do take pennies. They don't advertise this point, but they do take them. My own opinion is that, annoying though pennies may be, it's best for us economically to be allowed to price things as minutely as possible. Forcing us to work in 5-cent units will just make everyone push their prices 5 cents higher. And then inflation can only go up in units of 5, and on and on. More importantly, the penny allows stores to perform their favorite psych trick: selling things at, say, $9.99 because that makes most people think "Oh, under 10 bucks, that's cheap!" where the same person would go "Oh, too expensive" when presented with the same product for $10 even.
Plus it's a liberty thing; anytime the government just decides to do meaningless things like this and not even accept public input beforehand, I'm against it. The only reason governments want to do stuff like this is save money. Bills only last ~18 months, but coins can last 20-30 years or more. That's why they want to force $1 coins on the public. Yes, it would save money, but when compared with the entire government budget, it's the equivalent of a pack of gum. And to me, that little extra bit of money spend to keep people happy is worth it.
posted by aaron at 5:10 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by aaron at 5:12 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by leo at 5:38 PM on February 19, 2001
As for pennies: I'd love to do things Australian style, with pricing in pennies but rounding to nickels on a per-transaction basis. No statistical impact on pricing or twiddling with consumer psyches and we get rid of the infernal one-cent piece.
posted by youhas at 6:15 PM on February 19, 2001
That's just plain not true.
posted by jpoulos at 6:20 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by jpoulos at 6:25 PM on February 19, 2001
What are all your excuses?
posted by Capn_Stuby at 7:10 PM on February 19, 2001
The big question is: who asked for 'em?
posted by Dreama at 7:14 PM on February 19, 2001
My guess: the people who run mass transit, and those vending machine people who want to escape the tyranny of the dollar-bill reader companies.
And youhas: that's exactly what happens in the Netherlands as well. Price by the cent, round up or down to the nearest 5c.
Tangentially, it's bizarre that we now associate paper money with "real value", given the centuries it took for bills of exchange to replace precious metals as common currency. After all, it's paper money, when not backed by gold, that allows the kind of inflation that ends with banks stamping extra zeroes onto its notes.
posted by holgate at 7:25 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by leo at 7:36 PM on February 19, 2001
Not necessarily.
Firstly, look at what you said later in your post: most prices end in 9 cents for psychological reasons. So if prices were raised to compensate for a lack of pennies, they’d only raise one cent, not five.
However, even if the US phased out the penny, you may well find prices don’t change at all. That’s what happened here -- they phased out the one and two cent coins here in Australia about a decade ago, and prices are still in all sorts of denominations. When you get to the register, the total price is either round up or down, depending upon store policy. Most big stores, supermarkets, etc round down. Other stores round up. Nobody even comments on it, it’s a complete non-issue.
youhas has basically said this already, but I thought it was worth expanding on.
aaron wrote: And then inflation can only go up in units of 5, and on and on.
Inflation is a percentage change between one time period and another. You could perhaps argue that there would be a tiny jump the quarter following the removal of pennies due to prices being round up in some stores, but beyond that, it wouldn’t make any difference. Given the removal would be gradual, it’d be awfully hard to pinpoint anyway.
The idea that inflation could only go in units of 5 (5 units of what?) is incorrect.
If you don’t want to get rid of pennies, that’s cool, but the economic reasons you give don’t really work.
posted by Georgina at 8:16 PM on February 19, 2001
Holgate's not far off the mark. Here's the explanation given when the bill was introduced in the House. Running out of Anthony coins, all the vending machines' fault, yadda yadda. And, most importantly, it would Save Money, public feelings be damned.
posted by aaron at 9:12 PM on February 19, 2001
i chuck all my coinage in the coin tray in my car, and there's nothing as satisfying as dipping my hand in there to find i've got enough gold for a packet of ciggies, when i've bled my wallet dry.
posted by titboy at 9:35 PM on February 19, 2001
And aaron, that bill fell by the wayside. It was incorporated into the same bill for the fifty state quarters. The confusion was specifically provided for: "The dollar coin shall be golden in color, have a distinctive edge, have tactile and visual features that make the denomination ... readily discernible ... and have similar metallic, anti-counterfeiting properties as United States coinage in circulation on the date of enactment...." In other words, the counting-machine industry made sure that they wouldn't have to do much reprogramming, the blind got a coin that they could tell apart, the average consumer got a coin he didn't have to look twice at, and the collectors got a new coin they could stow away for a rainy day.
Aaron, if they didn't care about the public's feelings, Congress would have followed Canada's lead and phased out the dollar bill. (Language for that was in the one you linked to, but removed from the bill sent to the President.) Since they let people continued to use dollar bills, they doomed the dollar coin to more ignominy.
posted by dhartung at 9:45 PM on February 19, 2001
I actually like the bloody things, and tend to roll my eyes at the "change is bad" (pun unintentional – really) folks.
posted by harmful at 9:48 PM on February 19, 2001
(In the UK, it works out as about 50-60p for a can, which is no problem as far as change is concerned. And since we don't tip bar staff in the same way, the "dollar on the bar" isn't an issue.)
posted by holgate at 9:55 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by holgate at 10:05 PM on February 19, 2001
Price: $5.95
Those bastards!
posted by gleemax at 10:57 PM on February 19, 2001
posted by gluechunk at 12:02 AM on February 20, 2001
When are you 'mericans going to have your curency in color(tm)?
posted by fullerine at 5:00 AM on February 20, 2001
posted by Chairman_MaoXian at 7:14 AM on February 20, 2001
posted by Chairman_MaoXian at 7:20 AM on February 20, 2001
who the hell ever thought it was a good idea to print a ten thousand dollar bill?
I want one of those so I can see what the girl at Taco Bell will do with it.
posted by Sapphireblue at 8:20 AM on February 20, 2001
posted by xiffix at 8:23 AM on February 20, 2001
posted by sonofsamiam at 8:27 AM on February 20, 2001
But really, all this will go away, as more people move to electronic transactions. I only buy gas with cash maybe once a month anymore.
The $1/$20 thing is largely because many ATMs give out nothing but $20s. The stores just don't have that many tenners and fivers to give back. At Citibank, at least, you can get $10s.
Sapphire: in those days, no wire transactions. A $10,000 note is easier to carry around -- and lock up -- than the same amount in gold.
posted by dhartung at 8:31 AM on February 20, 2001
wacky!
(to go *completely* off-topic, this page is the first I've run into just surfing about to greet me by name with one of those blasted Amazon honor-pay graphics. blick, makeitgoaway.)
posted by Sapphireblue at 8:32 AM on February 20, 2001
Really? Me and most of my friends use cash almost exclusively, even for $100-$200 purchases. I didn't think anybody used the pay-at-the-pump thing.
posted by sonofsamiam at 8:34 AM on February 20, 2001
I don't know what I'd do if I lived in Oregon. Move, probably. (For those who don't know, self-serve gas stations of all types are apparently illegal in Oregon.)
posted by kindall at 9:48 AM on February 20, 2001
posted by MattD at 10:22 AM on February 20, 2001
(Optamystic, his "inner Beavis" appeased, wanders away to look at some pretty flowers.)
posted by Optamystic at 10:41 AM on February 20, 2001
You can still use plastic money - just hand it to the attendant. They'll come back with a little tray with a pen for you to sign the receipt. I don't know whether there's a way to use an ATM card, but does anyone still carry ATM cards that aren't also Visa cards?
-Mars
posted by Mars Saxman at 12:32 PM on February 20, 2001
Well, sure. It's not the plastic money itself that appeals to me, it's the hassle-free and efficient nature of dealing with a machine instead of a person.
posted by kindall at 12:50 PM on February 20, 2001
If they don't already have wireless Debit Card readers, they should soon. 'Course you guys have that check card thing going on, instead of debit card terminals everywhere.
The wireless debit terminals are handy though, because they can bring them straight to the car to swipe debit or credit cards.
posted by cCranium at 1:01 PM on February 20, 2001
too late!
posted by palegirl at 1:42 PM on February 20, 2001
posted by pikachulolita at 1:52 PM on February 20, 2001
rarely do i touch cash. value of never touching money god-knows-who touched because you've got debit mastercard? priceless. :-)
seriously though... when places like taco bell and mcdonalds take cards and have swipes at the checkouts and drive thrus, that will be the day i'll never see cash again, and you know what? i'll never look back. i buy my bus pass (cincinnati metro, its all we have here) via card, which creates another card.
posted by benjh at 2:19 PM on February 20, 2001
Actually, that reminds me of the debate I caught in the New York Times: there's a group of people who want to continue using the Subway token for their journeys, because they say the Metrocard system creates more litter from discarded plastic. And they have a decent point, I think. Plastic begets plastic. That is, until we all have our lives and bank balances recorded on smart cards. Just a matter of time.
posted by holgate at 6:00 PM on February 20, 2001
posted by jbushnell at 9:04 PM on February 20, 2001
Of course, it only makes sense to do this with a debit or ATM card, unless you have a generous grace period and pay off every month. Who wants to pay 19.8% on gas they've already used?
posted by dhartung at 9:04 PM on February 20, 2001
Almost every card does have a grace period these days. For example, because of the way the billing cycles work on my Visa, I didn't have to pay for the car I rented over Christmas until this week. The charge didn't show up on my January bill because the cycle closed on December 20, and the car was rented on the 22nd. It showed up on my February bill, which is due the 20th. Almost two full months interest-free!
If you regularly buy gas on your credit card then you will almost always have at least 30 days, and sometimes more like 60, to pay for it, depending on where in your billing cycle you make each individual purchase. Assuming, as you noted, that you pay off the balance in full each month. If you carry a balance, some cards start charging interest on the day of the purchase on some or all of a charge (often calculated based on an average daily balance).
I have, over the last couple of years, learned way too much about credit cards... like many Americans, they were the source of a lot of trouble for me. Now I buy everything on debit card.
posted by kindall at 12:01 AM on February 21, 2001
posted by kindall at 8:36 AM on February 21, 2001
In the Pittsburgh area, the KFCs, Taco Bells and Arbys all take plastic, and the KFCs even take checks. ("That's one three-piece meal, $4.85." "Okay, I'll write a check.") That idea scares me. But of course, my mother instilled certain principles about use of credit: never charge food, gasoline or pantyhose because they'll all be but distant memories by the time you get the bill.
posted by Dreama at 9:23 AM on February 21, 2001
« Older Windows XP Dev Intro Article | Screw cookie sales! Girlscouts try a new funding... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by Outlawyr at 11:28 AM on February 19, 2001