"...I find the language of George W much more offensive,"
February 21, 2001 5:18 AM Subscribe
I couldn't possibly comment on the offensiveness of that statement, apart from to suggest that if "better informed" were to replace "smarter", I'd find no fault with it.
Anyway, I'm waiting for Eminem to draft the first GWB State of the Union address.
posted by holgate at 6:49 AM on February 21, 2001
To put Eminem's ability to influence people and events on a par with Junior's is a gross oversimplification that amplifies Eminem's purported importance (and from what I've read, he doesn't need anybody to do that when he's doing such a good job himself) and diminishes Junior's (as if he were going to have any trouble living down to our expectations over the next four years...)
posted by m.polo at 7:03 AM on February 21, 2001
posted by Vetinari at 7:09 AM on February 21, 2001
The fare on Sheffield's tram from University to Hillsborough is 70 p. I gave the collector a pound coin and a 20 p, saying I'd like a 50 p coin back. He stared at the change, and then at me. This has happened several times. When I'm back in the States, people just shrug, "whatever", and do it anyway, even if they don't understand.
As for better informed... more people in the UK may read a daily paper, but most of those are owned by Rupert Murdoch, or have pictures of naked girls in them, or both.
Wait a sec - there's a literacy campaign for you. "The New York Times: All the tits that's fit to print.".
posted by methylsalicylate at 7:13 AM on February 21, 2001
posted by argybarg at 7:40 AM on February 21, 2001
posted by Optamystic at 8:42 AM on February 21, 2001
I would argue that trying to comprehend something simple and failing is "smarter" than not even bothering.
posted by dithered at 8:45 AM on February 21, 2001
I wont even get into the whole silliness of "royalty"
posted by bondcliff at 9:01 AM on February 21, 2001
And as far as sweeping generalizations go, the whole "Smart Brits vs. Dumb Yanks" thing is no more stupefyingly idiotic than any other.
posted by Skot at 9:25 AM on February 21, 2001
posted by holgate at 9:35 AM on February 21, 2001
I'm shocked!
posted by gtr at 10:46 AM on February 21, 2001
I couldn't possibly comment on the offensiveness of that statement, apart from to suggest that if "better informed" were to replace "smarter", I'd find no fault with it.
If you replaced "snobbier" with either of those, I'd agree. They figure Hollywood = America, we're all alike, and we're all definitely obsessed with Jim Carrey.
posted by dagnyscott at 3:17 PM on February 21, 2001
My favorite line: "'And after all, he's just a boy,' [Madonna] said of the 28-year-old." The average Brit can run dry-humor rings around slack-jawed 'Merkins.
posted by dhartung at 3:24 PM on February 21, 2001
I won't make a comment about that...
As for Madonna's views...who the hell cares? The only relevant person that they talked to was Elton John because he's in the minority that Eminem slams. And most people, at least a few years ago, would have said that Madonna 'could devalue the ceremony's "moral credibility".' So why again are they asking her if she thinks Eminem would?
posted by crushed at 6:31 PM on February 21, 2001
posted by Mars Saxman at 7:12 PM on February 21, 2001
« Older Opera Technical Preview 1 for Mac out Thursday | Barak Just Says No. Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
That's exactly the point, Tiaka. As offensive as Eminem is (and man, is he offensive), he's a performer, and there's at least some suggestion that his records are works of fiction. The stuff that Junior spouts is real.
Plus, she was using hyperbole.
posted by jpoulos at 6:46 AM on February 21, 2001