screamyGuy
June 22, 2008 4:39 PM Subscribe
This should have more comments because it is really good.
posted by Optimus Chyme at 9:01 PM on June 22, 2008
posted by Optimus Chyme at 9:01 PM on June 22, 2008
I think that's because most of us non-programmers can only say "that's neat."
posted by metaldark at 9:09 PM on June 22, 2008
posted by metaldark at 9:09 PM on June 22, 2008
I don't think I've ever seen a FPP with a higher favorite/comment ratio than this one.
posted by JHarris at 10:15 PM on June 22, 2008
posted by JHarris at 10:15 PM on June 22, 2008
This is very nice - I've seen a few processing examples before, but I didn't realise it was quite as versatile as this.
John Resig, the guy who wrote the jQuery library (the javascript library behind a lot of cool effects like lightbox-style image popups, although not the original Lightbox JS itself) has also ported Processing to javascript, which is amazing.
posted by kothar at 5:20 AM on June 23, 2008
John Resig, the guy who wrote the jQuery library (the javascript library behind a lot of cool effects like lightbox-style image popups, although not the original Lightbox JS itself) has also ported Processing to javascript, which is amazing.
posted by kothar at 5:20 AM on June 23, 2008
I think that's because most of us non-programmers can only say "that's neat."
Processing is designed for artfarts and other non programmers. How well it succeeds at that I cannot say. The problem with programming environments for non programmers is that they were inevitably created by programmers. Then again a programming environment designed by non programmers would probably look like Homer Simpson's car design.
I have looked at a couple of the books available to learn processing and here is what I have found.
This book is better for butter eaters who have programming experience.
This book is better for circumcised cats who have not.
Also, Jesus was a woman.
posted by fleetmouse at 7:34 AM on June 24, 2008 [3 favorites]
Processing is designed for artfarts and other non programmers. How well it succeeds at that I cannot say. The problem with programming environments for non programmers is that they were inevitably created by programmers. Then again a programming environment designed by non programmers would probably look like Homer Simpson's car design.
I have looked at a couple of the books available to learn processing and here is what I have found.
This book is better for butter eaters who have programming experience.
This book is better for circumcised cats who have not.
Also, Jesus was a woman.
posted by fleetmouse at 7:34 AM on June 24, 2008 [3 favorites]
« Older CRACKED and Loaded | Pakistan’s Phantom Border Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by fleetmouse at 5:04 PM on June 22, 2008