Double post. But a good one.
August 3, 2001 8:44 PM Subscribe
Double post. But a good one. This was posted about a year ago, but I just wasted two hours playing virtual Pictionary and had to make you all suffer the same fate.
Very fun.
Very fun.
I hadn't seen it before. This is outstanding.
posted by waxpancake at 10:04 PM on August 3, 2001
posted by waxpancake at 10:04 PM on August 3, 2001
A year ago? Sheesh, 80% of us weren't here then.
Tangent: This insisted I download the latest Shockwave Player. When it completed (15+ mins later), the installer started automatically, and closed down all four open browser windows, without asking first -- including a post I was editing in another thread. How mo-fo rude can you get?! It reopened the isketch window -- but I couldn't even play until I reboot. So, hell, may as well continue browsing for now ... except they closed all my effing windows!
Ijits.
posted by dhartung at 10:58 PM on August 3, 2001
Tangent: This insisted I download the latest Shockwave Player. When it completed (15+ mins later), the installer started automatically, and closed down all four open browser windows, without asking first -- including a post I was editing in another thread. How mo-fo rude can you get?! It reopened the isketch window -- but I couldn't even play until I reboot. So, hell, may as well continue browsing for now ... except they closed all my effing windows!
Ijits.
posted by dhartung at 10:58 PM on August 3, 2001
anildash: what rules?
"A good post to MetaFilter is something that meets the following criteria: most people haven't seen it before, there is something interesting about the content on the page, and it might warrant discussion from others."
IMHO, a year-old post is worth re-posting, if it is still relevant/cool/fun/interesting/worthwhile. as dhartung said, 80% of us weren't here a year ago, and i certainly haven't gone through all the posts i've missed in the past two years.
posted by o2b at 11:03 PM on August 3, 2001
"A good post to MetaFilter is something that meets the following criteria: most people haven't seen it before, there is something interesting about the content on the page, and it might warrant discussion from others."
IMHO, a year-old post is worth re-posting, if it is still relevant/cool/fun/interesting/worthwhile. as dhartung said, 80% of us weren't here a year ago, and i certainly haven't gone through all the posts i've missed in the past two years.
posted by o2b at 11:03 PM on August 3, 2001
anildash: i wonder if you know about the rule that forbids trolling...
sorry, you got my fur up.
posted by o2b at 12:26 AM on August 4, 2001
sorry, you got my fur up.
posted by o2b at 12:26 AM on August 4, 2001
Keep in mind that while 80% of us haven't seen this, you're probably pissing off the other 20%.
posted by gleemax at 9:02 AM on August 4, 2001
posted by gleemax at 9:02 AM on August 4, 2001
« Older Incredibly detailed pizza delivery etiquette... | Yahoo! Mail adds offers mailto: support. Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by anildash at 9:15 PM on August 3, 2001