Hook, line aaand sinker.
September 7, 2001 7:29 AM Subscribe
Maybe in '72. Trudeau's shtick hasn't been vicious, or even really satire, for nearly a generation. Nowadays, repeating the same jokes from 25 years ago gets a little tired. Bush is stupid, hee hee hee... look, it's Raoul Duke! He'll do something crazy, hee hee hee...
Doonesbury as political satire is roughly on par with that asshole who does the moronic little piano numbers about "current events." So, you can't really blame him for engaging in a little ex-Hippie wishful thinking. He probably had a deadline.
posted by UncleFes at 7:40 AM on September 7, 2001
posted by Doug at 7:48 AM on September 7, 2001
posted by jragon at 7:49 AM on September 7, 2001
The IQ number presented by the hoax was WAAAYYYY too high.
Can't blame Trudeau for this one. Lots of people fell for it besides him. It was just sooo in keeping with what we know about Duhbya.
Too bad his name wasn't Bobby Lee, then Cheney could have placed a cardboard cutout in the Oval office instead and have a ready made story line created just for media consumption...
Wait a minute! Isn't that what happened? Duhbya said it best himself: "I'm just a media creation."
posted by nofundy at 7:56 AM on September 7, 2001
sigh.
posted by jpoulos at 7:59 AM on September 7, 2001
Seriously, Trudeau may be politicalation, but he's just a cartoonistary.
posted by vito90 at 7:59 AM on September 7, 2001
We don't need a study ... we all accept it in one way or other ;-)
posted by a11an at 8:42 AM on September 7, 2001
posted by andrew cooke at 8:42 AM on September 7, 2001
posted by rschram at 8:58 AM on September 7, 2001
posted by SiW at 9:08 AM on September 7, 2001
posted by andrew cooke at 9:18 AM on September 7, 2001
Yes, but (how to put this delicately) 100 isn't average like you and I. Average is average average. The average, for example, doesn't visit Metafilter.
posted by jpoulos at 9:23 AM on September 7, 2001
I see.
posted by andrew cooke at 9:33 AM on September 7, 2001
I see.
Incidentally, I was wrong about the wording anyway. I wasn't paying enough attention to see that they are abbreviation. That period makes all the difference. Ah, semantics.
posted by SiW at 9:41 AM on September 7, 2001
Yes, basically. Not that MeFi is some kind of bastion of intellectual prowess or anything, but most of us don't intermingle with the people on the other side of the 100 marker (which is by definition an average IQ).
posted by delmoi at 9:49 AM on September 7, 2001
posted by rschram at 10:00 AM on September 7, 2001
delmoi: You might be surprised. IQ does have a close relationship to articulateness, and I'd say that quality distinguishes MeFi from most places, but the IQ scale is closely (and somewhat controversially) tied to certain qualities. There's a lot of things it doesn't measure.
posted by dhartung at 10:04 AM on September 7, 2001
That scale isn't new. It was used before PC police gave "retard" a negative connotation. The word retarded was a clinical definition for substandard mental and social development, a usage derived from the strict definition of the word. Same is true with the word idiot.
Not that we needed some hoax IQ chart to remind us the POTUS is a moron.
posted by eyeballkid at 10:25 AM on September 7, 2001
Bush Jr. went to Yale...and graduated with a C average. He went to Harvard for an MBA, but only after the University of Texas turned him down for admission into its law school
posted by thewittyname at 10:30 AM on September 7, 2001
posted by pixelshaper at 8:30 AM on September 8, 2001
Hey Matt,
So where's that feature for blocking specific users? I'm almost to the point where I'd pay for it.
posted by jragon at 9:22 AM on September 8, 2001
Reagan?
posted by Grangousier at 10:46 AM on September 8, 2001
posted by nicwolff at 11:11 AM on September 8, 2001
funny, the correct use of the term 'retards' in the IQ scale gives me *more* faith in it.
posted by jcterminal at 11:15 AM on September 8, 2001
IQ is a dicey thing, and generally speaking I dismiss it- while there are obviously variations of intelligence, I believe that beyond that 3rd SD you're basically in bald-faced estimation territory because accurate tests cannot exist- and what, exactly, is the qualitative difference between say an alleged 150 IQ and an alleged 175 IQ, besides that score on the test and the supposed rarity it implies? And how useful, for example, are "parlor trick" examples of intelligence like lightning calculators or eidetic memories? Are these really intelligence, or just minor flukes of brain power that don't really matter to any assessment of intelligence? Most amusing are those alleged 210, 215+ IQs or whatever that make someone's IQ so rare that the historical population of the entire human species is still 1,000 times too small to allow for the statistical likelihood of that person's intelligence occuring even once in all of human existence.
And with that, I simply must link here to my all-time favorite "High IQ" website, the Giga Society- the dissonance between this guy's professed IQ and the quality of this web page is so startling it single-handedly reveals high- IQ nonsense as nothing more than a cheap salve on the wounded egos of acceptably bright but insecure individuals. Oh, and note the opening sentence "Although the emblem of the Giga Society is not reprinted on this page, you may just be able to see it if you look very hard." Gee whiz, fella- most people with an IQ over 91 couldn't miss it!
Yeah, and besides Bush is StOoPiD! Neener neener neener! :)
posted by hincandenza at 12:55 PM on September 8, 2001
posted by kevspace at 1:15 PM on September 8, 2001
posted by aaron at 2:20 PM on September 8, 2001
I visited a couple of "Omega Society" web sites, and their publications are a hoot. On the order of perpetual motion machines hoots. Oh I see that at the Giga society, scoring high on an ESP test will get you in as well. Feh.
posted by meep at 2:27 PM on September 8, 2001
You must live a really sheltered life if you think someone with a truly "average" IQ could make it through Yale with a C average and get an MBA from Harvard.
We're not talking "average IQ among college students."
posted by straight at 9:48 AM on September 10, 2001
posted by jnthnjng at 10:44 AM on September 10, 2001
« Older We all need WOW Cards | Best. Auction. Ever. Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
1.) It maches a political ideology a bit too well
2.) It claims to measure IQ based on published books (probably co- or ghost-written, anyway) and speeches (eh, ditto).
3.) It's from Scranton, PA.
posted by dagnyscott at 7:39 AM on September 7, 2001