My Patent Is More Famous Than Your Patent
April 7, 2007 7:04 AM Subscribe
Google Patent Search can be a gold mine for a historical trivia. See the design for bucket seats patented by Steve McQueen, the secret communication system co-created by Hedy Lamarr that paved the way for the frequency hopping used by modern cell phones, the disposable infant garment made by Jamie Lee Curtis, the interactive music generation system made by Thomas Dolby of "She Blinded Me With Science" fame, and other unusual celebrity patents made by inventors that range from Abraham Lincoln to Zeppo Marx.
No, that's Hedy.
Her name was Hedwig, before, on the patent.
Hedley Lamarr was a character in Blazing Saddles.
posted by beagle at 7:23 AM on April 7, 2007 [1 favorite]
Her name was Hedwig, before, on the patent.
Hedley Lamarr was a character in Blazing Saddles.
posted by beagle at 7:23 AM on April 7, 2007 [1 favorite]
Hedley Lamarr: ...to Hedley Lamarr...
Men: ...to Hedy Lamarr...
Hedley Lamarr: That's *Hedley*!
I hope that clear things up for everyone.
This is actually pretty cool; I knew about the spread spectrum/frequency hopping patent of Hed(le)y Lamarr, but these others are new to me.
posted by TedW at 7:28 AM on April 7, 2007
Men: ...to Hedy Lamarr...
Hedley Lamarr: That's *Hedley*!
I hope that clear things up for everyone.
This is actually pretty cool; I knew about the spread spectrum/frequency hopping patent of Hed(le)y Lamarr, but these others are new to me.
posted by TedW at 7:28 AM on April 7, 2007
[rolls eyes]
Thanks for explaining the reference, guys.
posted by Tommy Gnosis at 7:31 AM on April 7, 2007
Thanks for explaining the reference, guys.
posted by Tommy Gnosis at 7:31 AM on April 7, 2007
Hedy's co-inventor on that was George Antheil, composer of Ballet Mechanique.
posted by StickyCarpet at 9:30 AM on April 7, 2007
posted by StickyCarpet at 9:30 AM on April 7, 2007
The Google Patent presentation is much nicer (and of course it uses Google's nice searching) but it doesn't include applications, just issued patents. For that reason, it's often better to use the USPTO's website.
posted by rxrfrx at 3:02 PM on April 7, 2007
posted by rxrfrx at 3:02 PM on April 7, 2007
I'm for a woman's right to choose and all, but really, Jamie Lee — why even bother to clothe a disposable infant? For shame, sir!
posted by rob511 at 3:32 PM on April 7, 2007 [1 favorite]
posted by rob511 at 3:32 PM on April 7, 2007 [1 favorite]
The Google Patent presentation is much nicer (and of course it uses Google's nice searching) but it doesn't include applications, just issued patents. For that reason, it's often better to use the USPTO's website.
And even better to use the European Patent Office's Espacenet website, which includes also applications and countries from all around the world, and not just the US.
Really, having been searching patents for over ten years now, I fail to understand the enthusiasm for Google Patent. It isn't really a very good tool, and I don't want to think of how Google is going to make money out of it. It does have really, really good marketing, though.
posted by Skeptic at 5:53 PM on April 7, 2007 [1 favorite]
And even better to use the European Patent Office's Espacenet website, which includes also applications and countries from all around the world, and not just the US.
Really, having been searching patents for over ten years now, I fail to understand the enthusiasm for Google Patent. It isn't really a very good tool, and I don't want to think of how Google is going to make money out of it. It does have really, really good marketing, though.
posted by Skeptic at 5:53 PM on April 7, 2007 [1 favorite]
Stupid question that I'll post properly on askmefi later:
Is is legal to fabricate widgets, that someone else has a patent on, and then go and loan or give away said widgets? (This would be while not charging any money for these widgets.)
posted by sebastienbailard at 1:48 AM on April 8, 2007
Is is legal to fabricate widgets, that someone else has a patent on, and then go and loan or give away said widgets? (This would be while not charging any money for these widgets.)
posted by sebastienbailard at 1:48 AM on April 8, 2007
IANAL, but the effect on the patent holder would be the same, or worse than selling said widgets for profit. You almost certainly would deprive them of sales they otherwise would have made. You also might damage their reputation if said widgets were inferior in some way. You likely would not offer service and/or repair. You also would be riding on their advertising/publicity/reputation. You also would set a precedent that could be used in court by someone who did want to replicate said widgets for profit. Do you really think you would be allowed to make and give away iPods or Starbucks mugs, for example?
posted by weapons-grade pandemonium at 10:00 AM on April 8, 2007
posted by weapons-grade pandemonium at 10:00 AM on April 8, 2007
Thanks, weapons-grade pandemonium. I hadn't considred that aspect of things. You seem to be correct.
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/appxl_35_U_S_C_154.htm#usc35s154
(1) CONTENTS.-Every patent shall contain a short title of the invention and a grant to the patentee, his heirs or assigns, of the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the invention throughout the United States or importing the invention into the United States, and, if the invention is a process, of the right to exclude others from using, offering for sale or selling throughout the United States, or importing into the United States, products made by that process, referring to the specification for the particulars thereof.
Note: iPods and Starbucks mugs involve trademark law, mostly.
posted by sebastienbailard at 10:56 AM on April 8, 2007
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/appxl_35_U_S_C_154.htm#usc35s154
(1) CONTENTS.-Every patent shall contain a short title of the invention and a grant to the patentee, his heirs or assigns, of the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the invention throughout the United States or importing the invention into the United States, and, if the invention is a process, of the right to exclude others from using, offering for sale or selling throughout the United States, or importing into the United States, products made by that process, referring to the specification for the particulars thereof.
Note: iPods and Starbucks mugs involve trademark law, mostly.
posted by sebastienbailard at 10:56 AM on April 8, 2007
the interactive music generation system made by Thomas Dolby of "She Blinded Me With Science" fame.
Well, he is the founder of Beatnik, Inc, after all.
posted by Plutor at 7:10 AM on April 9, 2007
Well, he is the founder of Beatnik, Inc, after all.
posted by Plutor at 7:10 AM on April 9, 2007
« Older Mamma mia. She exists! | Fighting PTSD the only way they know how. Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
That's Hedley.
Good post.
posted by Tommy Gnosis at 7:10 AM on April 7, 2007 [2 favorites]