As the tide flows
October 9, 2010 7:15 AM Subscribe
Philip Scott Johnson does morphing
Van Gogh self portraits
60 years of actresses
60 years of actors
women in film
Women In Art here previously; 500 Years of Female Portraits in Western Art now with links to original artwork.
Van Gogh self portraits
60 years of actresses
60 years of actors
women in film
Women In Art here previously; 500 Years of Female Portraits in Western Art now with links to original artwork.
I like that they morphed Archie Bunker into George Jefferson.
posted by notsnot at 8:31 AM on October 9, 2010
posted by notsnot at 8:31 AM on October 9, 2010
60 years of actresses
60 years of women looking like they're terribly interested in what I'm saying.
posted by Faze at 8:31 AM on October 9, 2010
60 years of women looking like they're terribly interested in what I'm saying.
posted by Faze at 8:31 AM on October 9, 2010
10 Years of Glamour Shots, please.
posted by rageagainsttherobots at 9:11 AM on October 9, 2010 [1 favorite]
posted by rageagainsttherobots at 9:11 AM on October 9, 2010 [1 favorite]
I really like the smoother interpolation of the actors/actresses ones. Watching these really reminded me of how much of the human brain must be devoted to recognizing facial features, as even the slightest changes seemed to result in totally different faces.
posted by Rhomboid at 10:08 AM on October 9, 2010 [1 favorite]
posted by Rhomboid at 10:08 AM on October 9, 2010 [1 favorite]
Funny you say that, Rhomboid. I thought the exact opposite while watching Van Gogh's self portraits. He varies the facial features a lot but retains his likeness.
posted by yaymukund at 10:16 AM on October 9, 2010 [1 favorite]
posted by yaymukund at 10:16 AM on October 9, 2010 [1 favorite]
I really liked how, in the Van Gogh one, left-to-right and right-to-left morphs sometimes yielded an extremely strong sense of convexity. It was like the face was coming out of the screen!
posted by tickingclock at 10:42 AM on October 9, 2010 [1 favorite]
posted by tickingclock at 10:42 AM on October 9, 2010 [1 favorite]
same here, I almost always track on the noses and eyes. I thought is was interesting how similar many of these people look.
I;ve always liked software morphing - ever since seeing this many years ago.
posted by archivist at 10:44 AM on October 9, 2010
I;ve always liked software morphing - ever since seeing this many years ago.
posted by archivist at 10:44 AM on October 9, 2010
I was very disappointed that his El Greco film in the sidebar wasn't a morph. I loved the Van Gogh one, though.
posted by immlass at 10:46 AM on October 9, 2010
posted by immlass at 10:46 AM on October 9, 2010
Ditto, yaymukund. I spent the time wondering if his actual face metrics could be deduced from all that data, despite the fact that they were so true to form visually* that one could pick him out of a crowd. With earmuffs on.
*As evidenced by how similar the many, many portaits were over the years.
posted by IAmBroom at 10:50 AM on October 9, 2010
*As evidenced by how similar the many, many portaits were over the years.
posted by IAmBroom at 10:50 AM on October 9, 2010
Having just sampled everything from Cezanne to Baroque Art I must say that the Van Gogh one is truly the best experience.
posted by The Lady is a designer at 11:55 AM on October 9, 2010
posted by The Lady is a designer at 11:55 AM on October 9, 2010
Yes, it's the eyes and noses (and mouths) that are most important to work with when morphing. I did a few so long ago that they're hosted on tripod.
posted by MrMoonPie at 12:15 PM on October 9, 2010
posted by MrMoonPie at 12:15 PM on October 9, 2010
« Older Oil Change & GPS Tracker Removal, Only $19.99! | You're Stealing it Wrong: 30 Years of Inter-Pirate... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by nickyskye at 7:24 AM on October 9, 2010 [10 favorites]